Wikipedy:Oerlisside/Argyf20
Dit is in argyfside.
Pas de tekst op dizze side net mear oan.
Wikipedy:Oerlisside/Argyf20, argyf fan Wikipedy:Oerlisside:
- Oerlis begûn fan 1 jannewaris 2022 oant en mei 31 desimber 2022.
Belangryk: Kontrôle behearder aktivens
[boarne bewurkje]Goeie. In berjocht oangeane it ynlúken fan de ekstra rjochten (rjochtenútfurder, behearder, omjouwingsbehearder, ensfh. ) is fêststeld troch konsensus yn 2013. As gefolch fan dit belied, kontrolearje de stewards de aktiviteit fan behearders op alle Wikimedia Foundation wiki's dy't hjirfoar gjin eigen belied hawwe. Foar safier at wy witte hat jim wiki gjin formiele wurkwize om de ekstra rjochten fuort te heljen fan net mear brûkte accounts. Dat betsjut dat de stewards dizze taak op harren nimme mei as útgongspunt de behearders aktiviteits kontôle.
Wy hawwe feststêld dat de neikommende brûkers foldogge oan it inaktiviteits kriterium (gjin oanpassing en no festleine aksjes yn de lêste twa jier):
- Aliter (rjochtenútfurder, behearder)
Dizze brûkers sille ynkoarten in berjocht krije, wêr't se frege wurdt om in diskusje yn de mienskip te begjinnen mochten sy guon of alle rjochten hâlde wolle. At de brûkers net reagearje, dan sille de ekstra rjochten ferwidere wurde troch de stewards.
Lykwols, as jim as mienskip graach in belied opsette wolle foar jim eigen aktiviteits kontrôle dy't de algemiene kontrôle ferfangt, as in oare beslút nimme wolle oer dizze inaktieve behearders, as at jim al in belied opset hawwe dy't wy oer de holle sjoen hawwe, lit it dan witte oan de stewards op Meta-Wiki sadat wy witte dat wy dizze kontrôle net mear op jim wiki hoeche út te fieren. Tankewol. Stanglavine (oerlis) 5 jan 2022, 14.41 (CET)
- Sjoen. Drewes (oerlis) 5 jan 2022, 16.41 (CET), Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 6 jan 2022, 20.49 (CET)
Wiki Loves Folklore is back!
[boarne bewurkje]Please help translate to your language
You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.
You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.
You can also organize a local contest in your country and support us in translating the project pages to help us spread the word in your native language.
Feel free to contact us on our project Talk page if you need any assistance.
Kind regards,
Wiki loves Folklore International Team
--MediaWiki message delivery (oerlis) 9 jan 2022, 14.15 (CET)
Feminism and Folklore 2022
[boarne bewurkje]Please help translate to your language
Greetings! You are invited to participate in Feminism and Folklore 2022 writing competion. This year Feminism and Folklore will focus on feminism, women biographies and gender-focused topics for the project in league with Wiki Loves Folklore gender gap focus with folk culture theme on Wikipedia.
You can help us in enriching the folklore documentation on Wikipedia from your region by creating or improving articles focused on folklore around the world, including, but not limited to folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, women and queer personalities in folklore, folk culture (folk artists, folk dancers, folk singers, folk musicians, folk game athletes, women in mythology, women warriors in folklore, witches and witch hunting, fairy tales and more. You can contribute to new articles or translate from the list of suggested articles here.
You can also support us in organizing the contest on your local Wikipedia by signing up your community to participate in this project and also translating the project page and help us spread the word in your native language.
Learn more about the contest and prizes from our project page. Feel free to contact us on our talk page or via Email if you need any assistance...
Thank you.
Feminism and Folklore Team,
Call for Feedback about the Board of Trustees elections is now open
[boarne bewurkje]The Call for Feedback: Board of Trustees elections is now open and will close on 7 February 2022.
With this Call for Feedback, the Movement Strategy and Governance team is taking a different approach. This approach incorporates community feedback from 2021. Instead of leading with proposals, the Call is framed around key questions from the Board of Trustees. The key questions came from the feedback about the 2021 Board of Trustees election. The intention is to inspire collective conversation and collaborative proposal development about these key questions.
Best,
Movement Strategy and Governance
Xeno (WMF) 15 jan 2022, 02.04 (CET)
Subscribe to the This Month in Education newsletter - learn from others and share your stories
[boarne bewurkje]Dear community members,
Greetings from the EWOC Newsletter team and the education team at Wikimedia Foundation. We are very excited to share that we on tenth years of Education Newsletter (This Month in Education) invite you to join us by subscribing to the newsletter on your talk page or by sharing your activities in the upcoming newsletters. The Wikimedia Education newsletter is a monthly newsletter that collects articles written by community members using Wikimedia projects in education around the world, and it is published by the EWOC Newsletter team in collaboration with the Education team. These stories can bring you new ideas to try, valuable insights about the success and challenges of our community members in running education programs in their context.
If your affiliate/language project is developing its own education initiatives, please remember to take advantage of this newsletter to publish your stories with the wider movement that shares your passion for education. You can submit newsletter articles in your own language or submit bilingual articles for the education newsletter. For the month of January the deadline to submit articles is on the 20th January. We look forward to reading your stories.
Older versions of this newsletter can be found in the complete archive.
More information about the newsletter can be found at Education/Newsletter/About.
For more information, please contact spatnaikBerjocht:@wikimedia.org.
Movement Strategy and Governance News – Issue 5
[boarne bewurkje]Movement Strategy and Governance News
Issue 5, January 2022Read the full newsletter
Welcome to the fifth issue of Movement Strategy and Governance News (formerly known as Universal Code of Conduct News)! This revamped newsletter distributes relevant news and events about the Movement Charter, Universal Code of Conduct, Movement Strategy Implementation grants, Board elections and other relevant MSG topics.
This Newsletter will be distributed quarterly, while more frequent Updates will also be delivered weekly or bi-weekly to subscribers. Please remember to subscribe here if you would like to receive these updates.
- Call for Feedback about the Board elections - We invite you to give your feedback on the upcoming WMF Board of Trustees election. This call for feedback went live on 10th January 2022 and will be concluded on 16th February 2022. (continue reading)
- Universal Code of Conduct Ratification - In 2021, the WMF asked communities about how to enforce the Universal Code of Conduct policy text. The revised draft of the enforcement guidelines should be ready for community vote in March. (continue reading)
- Movement Strategy Implementation Grants - As we continue to review several interesting proposals, we encourage and welcome more proposals and ideas that target a specific initiative from the Movement Strategy recommendations. (continue reading)
- The New Direction for the Newsletter - As the UCoC Newsletter transitions into MSG Newsletter, join the facilitation team in envisioning and deciding on the new directions for this newsletter. (continue reading)
- Diff Blogs - Check out the most recent publications about MSG on Wikimedia Diff. (continue reading)
Xeno (WMF) 29 jan 2022, 04.27 (CET)
Updates on the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines Review
[boarne bewurkje]Hello everyone,
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees released a statement on the ratification process for the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) Enforcement Guidelines.
The Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) provides a baseline of acceptable behavior for the entire movement. The UCoC and the Enforcement Guidelines were written by volunteer-staff drafting committees following community consultations.
The revised guidelines were published 24 January 2022 as a proposed way to apply the policy across the movement. There is a list of changes made to the guidelines after the enforcement draft guidelines review. Comments about the guidelines can be shared on the Enforcement Guidelines talk page on Meta-wiki.
To help to understand the guidelines and process, the Movement Strategy and Governance (MSG) team will be hosting Conversation Hours on 4 February 2022 at 15:00 UTC, 25 February 2022 at 12:00 UTC, and 4 March 2022 at 15:00 UTC. Join the conversation hours to speak with the UCoC project team and drafting committee members about the updated guidelines and voting process.
The timeline is available on Meta-wiki. The voting period is March 7 to 21. All eligible voters will have an opportunity to support or oppose the adoption of the Enforcement guidelines, and share why. See the voting information page for more details.
Many participants from across the movement have provided valuable input in these ongoing conversations. The UCoC and MSG teams want to thank the Drafting Committee and the community members for their contributions to this process.
Sincerely,
Movement Strategy and Governance
Wikimedia Foundation
Xeno (WMF) 4 feb 2022, 04.55 (CET)
Leadership Development Task Force: Your feedback is appreciated
[boarne bewurkje]The Community Development team at the Wikimedia Foundation is supporting the creation of a global, community-driven Leadership Development Task Force. The purpose of the task force is to advise leadership development work.
The team is looking for feedback about the responsibilities of the Leadership Development Task Force. This Meta page shares the proposal for a Leadership Development Task Force and how you can help. Feedback on the proposal will be collected from 7 to 25 February 2022.
Xeno (WMF) 9 feb 2022, 03.35 (CET)
Wiki Loves Folklore is extended till 15th March
[boarne bewurkje]Greetings from Wiki Loves Folklore International Team,
We are pleased to inform you that Wiki Loves Folklore an international photographic contest on Wikimedia Commons has been extended till the 15th of March 2022. The scope of the contest is focused on folk culture of different regions on categories, such as, but not limited to, folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, etc.
We would like to have your immense participation in the photographic contest to document your local Folk culture on Wikipedia. You can also help with the translation of project pages and share a word in your local language.
Best wishes,
International Team
Wiki Loves Folklore
MediaWiki message delivery (oerlis) 22 feb 2022, 05.50 (CET)
Coming soon
[boarne bewurkje]Several improvements around templates
[boarne bewurkje]Hello, from March 9, several improvements around templates will become available on your wiki:
- Fundamental improvements of the VisualEditor template dialog (1, 2),
- Improvements to make it easier to put a template on a page (3) (for the template dialogs in VisualEditor, 2010 Wikitext and New Wikitext Mode),
- and improvements in the syntax highlighting extension CodeMirror (4, 5) (which is available on wikis with writing direction left-to-right).
- Johanna Strodt (WMDE) 28 feb 2022, 13.38 (CET)
Remember to Participate in the UCoC Conversations and Ratification Vote!
[boarne bewurkje]Hello everyone,
A vote in SecurePoll from 7 to 21 March 2022 is scheduled as part of the ratification process for the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) Enforcement guidelines. Eligible voters are invited to answer a poll question and share comments. Read voter information and eligibility details. During the poll, voters will be asked if they support the enforcement of the Universal Code of Conduct based on the proposed guidelines.
The Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) provides a baseline of acceptable behavior for the entire movement. The revised enforcement guidelines were published 24 January 2022 as a proposed way to apply the policy across the movement. A Wikimedia Foundation Board statement calls for a ratification process where eligible voters will have an opportunity to support or oppose the adoption of the UCoC Enforcement guidelines in a vote. Wikimedians are invited to translate and share important information. For more information about the UCoC, please see the project page and frequently asked questions on Meta-wiki.
There are events scheduled to learn more and discuss:
- A community panel recorded on 18 February 2022 shares perspectives from small- and medium-sized community participants.
- The Movement Strategy and Governance (MSG) team is hosting Conversation Hours on 4 March 2022 at 15:00 UTC. Please sign-up to interact with the project team and the drafting committee about the updated enforcement guidelines and the ratification process. See the Conversation Hour summaries for notes from 4 February 2022 and 25 February 2022.
You can comment on Meta-wiki talk pages in any language. You may also contact either team by email: msg
wikimedia.org or ucocprojectwikimedia.org
Sincerely,
Movement Strategy and Governance
Wikimedia Foundation
Xeno (WMF) 2 mrt 2022, 03.17 (CET)
Flaggen en skilden
[boarne bewurkje]Goeie, it foel my op dat der op de Nederlânske wikipedy moaiere ôfbyldingen stean foar de flaggen en skilden dan op de Fryske wikipedy. Kin dit ek feroare wurde? En sa ja hoe?
- @Anoniem-NOF: Ik soe it as a-technysk persoan net witte. Drewes (oerlis) 6 mrt 2022, 16.30 (CET)
- @Anoniem-NOF: Wy binne mar in lytse Wikipedy en hawwe net de "deskundigen" op sok mêd as de gruttere wikipedyen lykas de Ingelske, Dútske of Nederlânske hawwe. As der immen is dy't mear technysk is, is er/sy wolkom om se te ferbetterjen. Oars moatte we it hjirmei mar dwaan. --Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 6 mrt 2022, 20.10 (CET)
- @Anoniem-NOF: Ik tink dat myn mei-behearders de fraach net goed begripe. Ik nim oan dat jo de flaggen en wapens fan Fryske doarpen bedoele, om't jo dêr it measte mei dwaande binne. Alle ôfbyldings op 'e Nederlânske Wikipedy steane op Commons, dat it is simpelwei in kwestje fan it ferfangen fan 'e nammen. Foarbyld: by Hantum stiet yn 'e ynfoboks as flagge "Flagge fan Hantum.gif". Sokke gif-ôfbyldings binne yn 'e begjintiid fan 'e Wikipedy hjirre lokaal opladen, doe't der noch gjin bettere ôfbyldings beskikber wiene. Letter binne foar de measte doarpen flaggen en wapens yn it .svg-format beskikber kommen. Dy binne opladen op Commons en dêr makket de Nederlânske Wikipedy gebrûk fan. Dus dan moat "Flagge fan Hantum.gif" gewoan even ferfongen wurde troch "Hantum vlag.svg", en klear is Kees. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 7 mrt 2022, 00.51 (CET)
- Ja wat jo sizze bedoel ik. Hie it self ek al wat útfûn dus ha al in pear oanpast. Bedankt foar jo reaksje! Anoniem-NOF (oerlis) 7 mrt 2022, 06.51 (CET)
Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines ratification voting open from 7 to 21 March 2022
[boarne bewurkje]Hello everyone,
The ratification voting process for the revised enforcement guidelines of the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) is now open! Voting commenced on SecurePoll on 7 March 2022 and will conclude on 21 March 2022. Please read more on the voter information and eligibility details.
The Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) provides a baseline of acceptable behavior for the entire movement. The revised enforcement guidelines were published 24 January 2022 as a proposed way to apply the policy across the movement. You can read more about the UCoC project.
You can also comment on Meta-wiki talk pages in any language. You may also contact the team by email: ucocprojectwikimedia.org
Sincerely,
Movement Strategy and Governance
Wikimedia Foundation
Xeno (WMF) 8 mrt 2022, 01.52 (CET)
- It is wol wat wurk, mar foar eltsenien - en mei namme foar behearders - kin it gjin kwea en sjoch hjir efkes goed nei: dy UCoC sil hjir ek jilde. Wutsje 8 mrt 2022, 15.08 (CET)
- Oan eltsenien en mei namme de behearders Drewes, Geoffrey, Ieneach fan 'e Esk, Kening Aldgilles, Kneppelfreed en Steinbach, noch ris: ferdjip jimme hjir efkes yn, want de ynfiering fan dy UCoC kin konsekwinsjes hawwe foar de autonomy fan dit projekt. Fan behearders sil frege wurde dy UCoC eksplisyt te ûnderskriuwen, dus it is wol saak en wit wat op jimme ôfkomt. Sjoch foar in tige koarte gearfetting fan wat de bedoeling is hjir. Wutsje 15 mrt 2022, 14.42 (CET)
- @Wutsje, Drewes, en Kneppelfreed: Ik haw hjir even nei sjoen, mar dat stikje dat jo, Wutsje, hjirboppe oanrikkemandearje, fyn ik persoanlik net behelpsum. Dêr wurde je neat út gewaar oer wat dy UCoC no eins ynhâldt. It tinkt my dat de oare behearders better meta:Universal_Code_of_Conduct lêze kinne, begjinnend by it kopke 1 – Introduction en dan oan ûnderen ta. Ik leau net dat hjir wat by stiet dêr't we it op 'e Fryske Wikipedy net al lang oer iens binne. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 15 mrt 2022, 15.17 (CET)
- Dy koarte gearfetting giet oer de stimming dy't hjirboppe oankondige waard en dy't op dit stuit hâlden wurdt. Oer dy UCoC is yndied folle mear te lêzen, mar dat fine jin fia dy keppeling wol. De dingen dy't der wier ta dogge, binne te finen yn alle diskusjes op Meta oer de UCoC. Sels bin ik it der perfoarst net mei iens dat de WMF hjir (en op elk projekt) op basis fan tige rom omskreaune regels dwaan kin wat se wol wannear har dat útkomt - want dy kant giet it út. Wutsje 15 mrt 2022, 15.30 (CET)
- @Wutsje: It gie my der even om fan wat stiet der yn dy UCoC, en neffens my stiet der ynhâldlik neat yn dêr't we hjir op 'e Fryske Wikipedy dochs net al op hanthavenje, as behearders. Dat Wikimedia yngrypt yn 'e ôfsûnderlike projekten en sa de autonomy fan dy projekten oantaast, is in minne saak, dêr binne we it wol oer iens. Mar ik sjoch net yn wat we dêr tsjin dwaan kinne. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 15 mrt 2022, 16.23 (CET) Drewes (oerlis) 16 mrt 2022, 18.20 (CET) --Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 17 mrt 2022, 06.18 (CET)
- Sels haw ik, fansels mei in taljochting, tsjinstimd, al wit ik dat it neat úthelje sil. Wutsje 15 mrt 2022, 16.31 (CET)
- Soks kin wolris de krêft út de Wikipedia helje. Eins soenen wy in back-up fan Wikipedia hawwe moatte. De data fan de Fryske Wikipedia kopiearje nei in oare omjouwing. Wy moatte hjir ommers gjin Russyske tastannen hawwe. Ik wol foarkomme dat de grutte fûgel it lytsere fûgeltsje op ien of oare manier opfret. Wit ien fan jim hoe't wy in kopy fan de Frysktalige Wikipedia database meitsje kinne? Groetnis --Kening Aldgilles (oerlis) 16 mrt 2022, 17.47 (CET)
- Sels haw ik dêr gjin ferstân fan, mar ynformaasje dêroer stiet op m:Data dumps. Wutsje 16 mrt 2022, 18.57 (CET)
- Soks kin wolris de krêft út de Wikipedia helje. Eins soenen wy in back-up fan Wikipedia hawwe moatte. De data fan de Fryske Wikipedia kopiearje nei in oare omjouwing. Wy moatte hjir ommers gjin Russyske tastannen hawwe. Ik wol foarkomme dat de grutte fûgel it lytsere fûgeltsje op ien of oare manier opfret. Wit ien fan jim hoe't wy in kopy fan de Frysktalige Wikipedia database meitsje kinne? Groetnis --Kening Aldgilles (oerlis) 16 mrt 2022, 17.47 (CET)
- Sels haw ik, fansels mei in taljochting, tsjinstimd, al wit ik dat it neat úthelje sil. Wutsje 15 mrt 2022, 16.31 (CET)
- @Wutsje: It gie my der even om fan wat stiet der yn dy UCoC, en neffens my stiet der ynhâldlik neat yn dêr't we hjir op 'e Fryske Wikipedy dochs net al op hanthavenje, as behearders. Dat Wikimedia yngrypt yn 'e ôfsûnderlike projekten en sa de autonomy fan dy projekten oantaast, is in minne saak, dêr binne we it wol oer iens. Mar ik sjoch net yn wat we dêr tsjin dwaan kinne. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 15 mrt 2022, 16.23 (CET) Drewes (oerlis) 16 mrt 2022, 18.20 (CET) --Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 17 mrt 2022, 06.18 (CET)
- Dy koarte gearfetting giet oer de stimming dy't hjirboppe oankondige waard en dy't op dit stuit hâlden wurdt. Oer dy UCoC is yndied folle mear te lêzen, mar dat fine jin fia dy keppeling wol. De dingen dy't der wier ta dogge, binne te finen yn alle diskusjes op Meta oer de UCoC. Sels bin ik it der perfoarst net mei iens dat de WMF hjir (en op elk projekt) op basis fan tige rom omskreaune regels dwaan kin wat se wol wannear har dat útkomt - want dy kant giet it út. Wutsje 15 mrt 2022, 15.30 (CET)
- @Wutsje, Drewes, en Kneppelfreed: Ik haw hjir even nei sjoen, mar dat stikje dat jo, Wutsje, hjirboppe oanrikkemandearje, fyn ik persoanlik net behelpsum. Dêr wurde je neat út gewaar oer wat dy UCoC no eins ynhâldt. It tinkt my dat de oare behearders better meta:Universal_Code_of_Conduct lêze kinne, begjinnend by it kopke 1 – Introduction en dan oan ûnderen ta. Ik leau net dat hjir wat by stiet dêr't we it op 'e Fryske Wikipedy net al lang oer iens binne. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 15 mrt 2022, 15.17 (CET)
- Oan eltsenien en mei namme de behearders Drewes, Geoffrey, Ieneach fan 'e Esk, Kening Aldgilles, Kneppelfreed en Steinbach, noch ris: ferdjip jimme hjir efkes yn, want de ynfiering fan dy UCoC kin konsekwinsjes hawwe foar de autonomy fan dit projekt. Fan behearders sil frege wurde dy UCoC eksplisyt te ûnderskriuwen, dus it is wol saak en wit wat op jimme ôfkomt. Sjoch foar in tige koarte gearfetting fan wat de bedoeling is hjir. Wutsje 15 mrt 2022, 14.42 (CET)
Invitation to Hubs event: Global Conversation on 2022-03-12 at 13:00 UTC
[boarne bewurkje]Hello!
The Movement Strategy and Governance team of the Wikimedia Foundation would like to invite you to the next event about "Regional and Thematic Hubs". The Wikimedia Movement is in the process of understanding what Regional and Thematic Hubs should be. Our workshop in November was a good start (read the report), but we're not finished yet.
Over the last weeks we conducted about 16 interviews with groups working on establishing a Hub in their context (see Hubs Dialogue). These interviews informed a report that will serve as a foundation for discussion on March 12. The report is planned to be published on March 9.
The event will take place on March 12, 13:00 to 16:00 UTC on Zoom. Interpretation will be provided in French, Spanish, Arabic, Russian, and Portuguese. Registration is open, and will close on March 10. Anyone interested in the topic is invited to join us. More information on the event on Meta-wiki.
Best regards,
Kaarel Vaidla
Movement Strategy
10 mrt 2022, 02.31 (CET)
Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 ends tomorrow
[boarne bewurkje]International photographic contest Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 ends on 15th March 2022 23:59:59 UTC. This is the last chance of the year to upload images about local folk culture, festival, cuisine, costume, folklore etc on Wikimedia Commons. Watch out our social media handles for regular updates and declaration of Winners.
(Facebook , Twitter , Instagram)
The writing competition Feminism and Folklore will run till 31st of March 2022 23:59:59 UTC. Write about your local folk tradition, women, folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folklore, and tradition, including ballads, folktales, fairy tales, legends, traditional song and dance, folk plays, games, seasonal events, calendar customs, folk arts, folk religion, mythology etc. on your local Wikipedia. Check if your local Wikipedia is participating
A special competition called Wiki Loves Falles is organised in Spain and the world during 15th March 2022 till 15th April 2022 to document local folk culture and Falles in Valencia, Spain. Learn more about it on Catalan Wikipedia project page.
We look forward for your immense co-operation.
Thanks Wiki Loves Folklore international Team MediaWiki message delivery (oerlis) 14 mrt 2022, 15.40 (CET)
Leadership Development Working Group: Apply to join! (14 March to 10 April 2022)
[boarne bewurkje]Hello everyone,
Thank you to everyone who participated in the feedback period for the Leadership Development Working Group initiative. A summary of the feedback can be found on Meta-wiki. This feedback will be shared with the working group to inform their work. The application period to join the Working Group is now open and will close on April 10, 2022. Please review the information about the working group, share with community members who might be interested, and apply if you are interested.
Thank you,
From the Community Development team
Xeno (WMF) 18 mrt 2022, 03.20 (CET)
Pyt Paulusma
[boarne bewurkje]Hjoed is Piet Paulusma ferstoarn, No ha ik krekt in Ynfoboks oan de side oer Piet Paulusma tafoege, mar no foel it my op dat er hjir op de Wikipedy Pyt neamt wurdt. Ynstee fan Piet. Omrop Fryslân skriuwt altyd fan Piet Paulusma, dat Pyt mei y liket my net de krekte namme fan ús waarman. FreyaSport (oerlis) 20 mrt 2022, 18.17 (CET)
- @FreyaSport: Tsjong ja ik skrok derfan. In grut ferlies. Ik haw de folle namme derby set. Ik tink it kin hjir wol mei ta. Wat fine oare meidoggers derfan? --Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 20 mrt 2022, 18.34 (CET)
(nei bwk) Offisjeel is it Pieter, sjoch hjir by Franekeradeel (hy wie blykber ien fan in twilling, dat wist ik net). Foar beide staveringswizen is wat te sizzen, mar litte we mar oernimme hoe't it moarn of oaremoarn yn de adfertinsje yn de Ljouwerter stiet. Wutsje 20 mrt 2022, 18.41 (CET)
- Neffens my brûkte er sels de namme Piet, mar foar't we de side omneame fan Pyt nei Piet, en goed de biezem der troch hinne helje, yndied mar efkes de adfertinsje ôfwachtsje. FreyaSport (oerlis) 20 mrt 2022, 18.48 (CET)
- @Wutsje: @Kneppelfreed: De adfertinsje fan de famylje yn de Ljouwerter Krante jout Piet as ropnamme en net Pyt mei Y FreyaSport (oerlis) 23 mrt 2022, 17.01 (CET)
- @FreyaSport: dan meie jo it om mei wol omneame. Gr. Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 23 mrt 2022, 20.37 (CET)
Projekt WikiWomen
[boarne bewurkje][oernommen fan myn oerlisside, foar net-behearders is dit grif ek wol nijsgjirrich]
In tiid lyn hat myn kollega Mirjam Vellinga in berjochtsje pleatst op de Fryske Wikipedia om te oriïntearjen en om in breder byld te krijen fan de Fryske kant fan Wikipedia. Doe hat sy koart telefoanysk kontakt hân mei ien fan jimme. Underwilens is it projekt offisjeel fan start gien. By dizze de fraach oan jo oft wy mei jo (en de rest fan de behearders, oan wa’t itselde berjocht stjoerd wurdt) yn kontakt komme kinne om it oer it projekt te hawwen en it reitsflak mei de Fryske kant fan Wikipedia. Faaks hawwe we wat oan inoar!
Foar mear ynformaasje oer it projekt kinne jo sjen op: https://afuk.frl/nl/tige-slagge-earste-partnerbyienkomst-wikiwomen-yn-ljouwert/ , https://www.fryske-akademy.nl/en/news-and-events/news-item/news/detail/mear-frysk-en-mear-froulju-op-wikipedia-troch-europeesk-projekt/
Graach hear ik fan jo,
Mei freonlike groetnis,
Welmoed Sjoerdstra
Stazjêre Afûk
Projekt WikiWomen
Fan 'e middei haw ik Frou Sjoerdstra sprutsen en ik moat sizze: der sit wol muzyk yn dit projekt. Wutsje 22 mrt 2022, 21.02 (CET)
- @Wutsje: Dit klinkt net ferkeard, hjir wurdt ik wol fleurich fan in pear ekstra hannen binne altyd wolkom, mar we moatte der al wach foar wêze, dat de skoaljeugd der net fandalistysk yn om giet griemen. FreyaSport (oerlis) 22 mrt 2022, 21.12 (CET)
- Nei wat ik derfan begryp is dat no krekt ien fan de dingen dy't se goed yn it snotsje hâlde wolle. It giet der bygelyks ek om dat de jongerein bybrocht wurdt hoe wichtich boarnen binne en hoe't jin dêrmei al skriuwende omgean moatte. Belje har oars sels ris (fia de Afûk, 058-2343070), se sil der graach oer fertelle. Wutsje 22 mrt 2022, 21.20 (CET)
- Dan is it goed, Mar komt der op de fryske Wikipedy dan ek en projektside te stean dêr't we froulju oandrage kinne dêr't in side oer skreaun wurde moatte soe? Want ik woe eins moarn oan de slach mei Alissa White-Gluz de sjongeres fan Arch Enemy mar dan doch ik dat ynearsten net. Ik as gewoane Wikipediaan sûnder rjochten (wol ik ek net ha op dit stuit) sil mar net mei frou Sjoerdstra skilje. soks lit ik leaver oan de oaren oer. FreyaSport (oerlis) 22 mrt 2022, 21.35 (CET)
- Dat artikel soe ik mar gewoan skriuwe, liket my. Wat sa'n projektside oanbelanget: dat is in goed idee en in moai ûnderwerp om hjir te besprekken (fgl. dizze side). En ek mei Frou Sjoerdstra - wier, se byt net en se stiet iepen foar oerlis en gearwurking mei eltsenien, dus ek mei net-behearders. Wutsje 22 mrt 2022, 22.05 (CET)
- Ik haw eefkes aksje ûndernommen. Sjoch Wikipedy:Froulju sûnder side. Groetnis --Kening Aldgilles (oerlis) 3 apr 2022, 12.45 (CEST)
- @Kening Aldgilles: sjocht der bêst út. Tige tank. Gr. --Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 4 apr 2022, 05.47 (CEST)
- Ik haw eefkes aksje ûndernommen. Sjoch Wikipedy:Froulju sûnder side. Groetnis --Kening Aldgilles (oerlis) 3 apr 2022, 12.45 (CEST)
- Dat artikel soe ik mar gewoan skriuwe, liket my. Wat sa'n projektside oanbelanget: dat is in goed idee en in moai ûnderwerp om hjir te besprekken (fgl. dizze side). En ek mei Frou Sjoerdstra - wier, se byt net en se stiet iepen foar oerlis en gearwurking mei eltsenien, dus ek mei net-behearders. Wutsje 22 mrt 2022, 22.05 (CET)
- Dan is it goed, Mar komt der op de fryske Wikipedy dan ek en projektside te stean dêr't we froulju oandrage kinne dêr't in side oer skreaun wurde moatte soe? Want ik woe eins moarn oan de slach mei Alissa White-Gluz de sjongeres fan Arch Enemy mar dan doch ik dat ynearsten net. Ik as gewoane Wikipediaan sûnder rjochten (wol ik ek net ha op dit stuit) sil mar net mei frou Sjoerdstra skilje. soks lit ik leaver oan de oaren oer. FreyaSport (oerlis) 22 mrt 2022, 21.35 (CET)
- Nei wat ik derfan begryp is dat no krekt ien fan de dingen dy't se goed yn it snotsje hâlde wolle. It giet der bygelyks ek om dat de jongerein bybrocht wurdt hoe wichtich boarnen binne en hoe't jin dêrmei al skriuwende omgean moatte. Belje har oars sels ris (fia de Afûk, 058-2343070), se sil der graach oer fertelle. Wutsje 22 mrt 2022, 21.20 (CET)
Keppelingen
[boarne bewurkje]Goeie Ieneach, in fraach nei oanlieding fan dizze en dizze bewurkingen: wat is neffens jo it nut fan al dy keppelingen? Soe der immen wêze dy't net wit wêr Ljouwert en Nederlân lizze of wat hout is? Is it wier nedich en keppelje yn ien artikel acht kear it jiertal 2018? Wat fine alle oare meidoggers dêrfan? Groetenis, Wutsje 22 mrt 2022, 22.51 (CET)
- @Wutsje: Goeie. It giet my der fansels net om dat immen net witte soe wat hout of sân of de sinne of de moanne is. Ik set dy keppelings deryn om 'e lêzers safolle mooglik te ferlieden om fierder te lêzen op oare siden. Dat liket my in moai stribjen. Dêrby hâldt ik foar mysels de regel oan om ien link per wurd op in side te dwaan. Dus as ik bgl. hout link, en dat wurd komt letter noch in kear werom, dan link ik it dan net wer. (Dat ûntkomt my fansels wolris, dat kin net oars.) Wat de jiertallen oangiet, dy link ik altyd, mar dat is mear foar mysels, om't ik se dan makliker yn 'e tekst weromfine kin. Ik fyn dat ek by it lêzen fan in artikel hiel noflik. Ik fyn dit earlik sein gjin ûnderwerp foar diskusje op 'e Oerlisside, om't it ta de lay-out heart en dy mei in skriuwer fan in artikel nei eigen goedtinken foarmjaan. Ik hoopje net dat jo mear fan myn siden "ûntlinke". Dat soe ik hiel ferfelend fine. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 22 mrt 2022, 23.13 (CET)
- Ik bin it mei Ieneach iens Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 23 mrt 2022, 20.45 (CET)
Ik bin it mei Wutsje iens. Ik ha der nea wat fan sein omdatst it net ferkeard neame kinst, mar it steurt my wol. Al dy kleurkes yn de tekst fyn ik rommelich en ferliede my seker net om fierder te lêzen, earder oarsom. Ik bin foar it ferwizen nei dingen dy't ta de saak fan it oanbelangjende ûnderwerp dogge. It fernuveret my dêrom ek net dat it op oare wikipedias ferbean is en/of net foarkomt. Jo, Ieneach, binne de iennichste wikipediaan fan 'e wrâld dy't dit docht. Drewes (oerlis) 29 mrt 2022, 18.01 (CEST)
- @Drewes: Jo hawwe alris earder oanjûn hoe't jo hjiryn steane, dat ik wie my hjirfan bewust. Ik haw hjirboppe en ek hjirûnder nochris, by myn reäksje rjochte oan Wutsje, útlein wêrom't ik dit doch. Neffens my hat it ek effekt, want as der nearne in link nei nei sokke siden stie, waarden siden as "soan" net sa faak besocht. Ik wit fierders net wat ik mei jo miening oan moat. Moat ik my dan oanpasse oan hoe't jo it hawwe wolle ek al bin ik it dêr hielendal net mei iens? Ik fyn fan net. Hoe't jo siden skriuwe, dêr haw ik ek problemen mei. Jo binne dan wer it oare uterste en linke bytiden frijwol neat. Ik besykje mar om safolle mooglik jo kar datoangeande te respektearjen. Fierders wit ik it ek net. Litte we it gewoan iens wurde dat we it oer dit punt ûniens binne en deroerhinne stappe. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 31 mrt 2022, 02.05 (CEST)
Reaksje / Oer dizze wikipedy
[boarne bewurkje]@Ieneach: oer dat de kar foar wol of net keppelje gearhinget mei "foarmjaan" wurdt gâns ferskaat tocht. Sels fyn ik tekst mei in soad keppelingen en dus kleurkes sawat ûnlêsber en dêryn bin ik net de iennige, sjoch bgl. de:WP:V, en:WP:LINK, en:MOS:OL, fr:WP:PLI en nl:H:WLF ("dat jildt hjir net": nee, mar it giet my om de arguminten en dy hingje net fan taal ôf). Wat dy jiertallen en "dat is mear foar mysels" oanbelanget: dit is in wikipedy, dy't skreaun wurdt foar lêzers, it is net allinnich jo partikuliere projekt. De Fryske wikipedy barst sa súntsjesoan hast út inoar fan de oerstallige keppelingen. Foar wa kin in keppeling nei wurden as soan of man (minske) no yn fredesnamme bedoeld wêze? Wat hat de lêzer der oan dat in jiertal acht kear keppele is? Ek oerstallich binne fierhinne de measte kategoryen: dy binne bedoeld om de lêzer te helpen artikels te finen, net om, sa't lju as Wikix tinke, alles yn de wrâld yn kreas oersichtlike hokjes te triuwen, want yn dy útwreide kategorybeammen fynt de lêzer nea wat werom. Ik kin it mis hawwe, mar mei tsjinspraak lykje jo nea safolle op te hawwen. In foarbyld fûn ik jo reaksjes op Oerlis:Bistedokterspraktyk It Griene Hert op Drewes en foaral op Tulp8. In oar foarbyld is wat my oanbelanget dat konsekwint oeral -uële skriuwe ek as dat perfoarst net nedich is, inkeld omdat jo dat sa wend binne (kepp.). Mar jo binne net de noarm: de noarm is Dijkstra (1996).
It giet dochs al net geweldich mei fy:wiki. Lykas oeral wurdt nije artikels skriuwe hjir graach dien (al sjit de boarnefernijing der faak by yn: "fan nl" (soms mei fouten en al, sjoch bgl. hjir) , of "Ljouwerter Krante, meardere data yn 1844"), mar besteande artikels oanfolle, ferbetterje, byhâlde of sels mar ûntflaterje wurdt hast net dien. Net allinnich de lêzer is dêrfan de klos, mar úteinlik giet de reputaasje fan 'e wiki der ek oan.
It aldergrutste probleem is lykwols dat der te min meidoggers binne. Dêrom is in reaksje as dizze op it idee fan Welberry en de harren yn myn eagen wat oan de sneue kant: elk inisjatyf om de jongerein derby te krijen wêr't it giet om kennis frij beskikber te meitjsen én it Frysk te befoarderjen (of yn elts gefal yn 'e tiid te hâlden) moat, fyn ik, oanmoedige wurde. Wa't ien kear leard hat hoe't jin in goed artikel skriuwe, skriuwt fansels ek stikjes oer oare ûnderwerpen as froulju. Dit projekt moat iepen stean foar elk dy't meidwaan wol, wol it noch in takomst hawwe. De meidoggers hjirre sille harren oan 'e tiid oanpasse moatte, want oarsom sil dat net barde. Wutsje 29 mrt 2022, 18.05 (CEST)
- @Wutsje: Moai Wutsje dat jo hjir sporadysk even oanwêzich binne en tagelyk krityk uterje op de wurkwize fan ús fêste meidoggers. Fansels moat it wêze kinne dat immen krityk leverje kin of it net iens wêze mei oare meidoggers. Yn prinsipe hawwe jo wol gelyk, mar ik sjoch jo hjir net al te faak warber, dus fyn ik it in bytsje nuver dat jo ús de les leare wolle. En yndie wy binne in lytse klup en it is slim om alles út te sykjen dêrom nimme wy gauris dingen fan nl, en, of de oer. En boppedat binne we gauris warber besteande siden oan te foljen, by de tiid te bringen of ferbetterjen. We binne op it stuit dwaande nije ynfoboksen te setten by de siden fan Fryske doarpen. Ek haw ik trochferwiisbalken makke fan eltse Fryske gemeenten mei harren plakken, dat makket sykjen makliker, lykas op oare wiki's. Tagelyk wolle we net bûn oan allinnich besteande siden wêze mar tagelyk ek wol nije siden skriuwe. We binne frijwilligers, we binne net ferplichte ta beskate dingen. It soe tige moai wêze dat der mear frijwilligers wêze koene dy't hjir oan meidwaan wolle, dat sil dizze wikipedy tige goed dwaan. We kinne mei ús lytse klupke net alles dwaan. Gr. --Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 30 mrt 2022, 00.35 (CEST)
- Dat der mear minsken by moatte, is no krekt myn punt. It yn DKVT en Delpher opsykjen fan op dizze wiki oanhelle, mar net keppele stikjes út de LC en it FD, wêr't ik de lêste wiken mei dwaande bin, kostet per artikel in soad tiid en ja, dat sjogge jin dan net werom yn myn oantal bewurkingen. Spitegernôch geane jo fierder net yn op de ynhâld fan wat ik skriuw en ik hoech my tsjinoer nimmen te ferantwurdzjen oer wat ik hjir wannear wol of net doch. Der kinne ferdomd goeie redenen wêze wêrom immen der hast in jier net is. Dit is in Wikipedy, gjin sekte. Wutsje 30 mrt 2022, 02.03 (CEST)
@Wutsje: Tsja, jo bringe in hiel soad ferskillende dingen yn, mar ik sil besykje jo sa goed mooglik te antwurdzjen. Ik sil jo arguminten hjirûnder eefkes kearneftich gearfetsje om oan te jaan wêr't ik it oer haw.
- Oare Wikipedyen hawwe regels foar trochlinken nei oare artikels: Dat sil 't wol, mar sokke regels hawwe wy hjir net. De Fryske Wikipedy hat as útgongspunt om 'e meidoggers sa frij mooglik te litten en sa min mooglik regels yn te fieren. In besykjen, ferline jier, om dochs ta it opstellen fan wat regels te kommen (net hjiroer), is jammerdearlik mislearre en beslist net troch myn tadwaan. It wie by oare meidoggers dêr't de wil dêrfoar doe ûntbriek. It ûnderwerp trochlinken soe ik dan wer ûngeskikt fine foar it ynfieren fan regels, om't dit nei myn miening ta de lay-out heart, en dat mei de skriuwer sels bepale.
- "De Fryske Wikipedy barst sa súntsjesoan hast út inoar fan de oerstallige keppelingen": Dat is jo miening. Ik fyn se net oerstallich. As jo jo sin krigen soe der nearne in link nei "soan" en "hout" stean. Dan wit de lêzer net dat dy artikels besteane en sille se dus (sa goed as) noait lêzen wurde. Wat hat de lêzer oan sokke links, freegje jo? Nou, as je in stikje fan in artikel lêze en wat browse, bgl. om 'e tiid te deadzjen, sa't in protte minsken faak dogge, en dan sjogge se in link nei "soan", dan tinke se miskien fan "hee, hawwe se dêr ek in artikel oer? Ris sjen wat se dêroer skriuwe." Dat se wol witte wat in soan of hout is, docht der net ta. Minsken wolle graach befêstige wurde yn dingen dy't se al witte, oars soe sa'n side net sa faak lêzen wurde ("soan" 174 kear yn 'e ôfrûne moanne, in echte útsjitter foar de Wikipedy). It hat wol hûndert kear of mear safolle kâns dat se op sa'n tafallich tsjinkommen link klikke as dat se nei boppen scrolle om yn it sykfinster "soan" yn te typen. De minske is fan natuere gemaksuchtich, dat witte jo grif ek wol. No sil der miskien net sa rare faak op guon fan sokke links klikt wurde, mar as der gjin link is, wurdt der yn elts gefal hielendal net op klikt. Sa't ik al earder sei, ik besykje dêrmei de lêzer te ferlieden om troch te lêzen. Ik begryp earlik sein net wat jo dêr op tsjin hawwe kinne, sjoen jo opstelling oangeande Welberry en har projekt, want dat besiket yn grutte linen itselde te berikken.
- "Fierhinne de measte kategoryen binne oerstallich": No moat it al net raarder wurde. Hoe kinne jo no behearder wêze en soks skriuwe? Ik sjoch yn prinsipe gjin tsjinstelling tusken "de lêzers helpe om artikels te finen" en "de wrâld yn kreas oersichtlike hokjes triuwe". Neffens my is dat yn dit ferbân itselde. As de artikels oersichtlik yndield binne, kinne de lêzers se better fine. Ik wit net wa't Wikix is of wat dy jo misdien hat. Ik sykje sels geregeldwei ûnderwerpen dêr't ik de nammen net fan betinke kin fia de kategoryen, en ik woe wol dat de kategory-yndieling op nl: wat better regele wie. Dêr binne de romantyske komeedzjes net iens nei nasjonaliteit yndield, murk ik lêsten...
- Oer dat ik net oer tsjinspraak kinne soe: Dat bin ik net mei jo iens. Jo neame myn reäksje op Drewes op Oerlis:Bistedokterspraktyk It Griene Hert. Ik haw dat nochris weromlêzen, mar ik begryp totaal net wat der mis is mei myn reäksje. Drewes komt mei in miening, ik reägear troch myn eigen miening te jaan. Myn reäksje op Tulp8 is wat oars. Dy hie my hiel belearend en út 'e hichte tasprutsen, nota bene sûnder ynhâldlik op 'e diskusje yn te gean dy't op dat stuit al útiten wie. Dêr haw ik my yndie even nidich om makke, mar dat gie net oer krityk op myn stikje, mar oer algemiene omgongsfoarmen, dêr't Tulp8 him op dat stik neffens my net oan holden hat.
- Neidat ik in automatysk seintsje op nl: krige dat myn namme hjir neamd is, wol ik der hjir ek wat oer sizze. Oars soe it oerkomme kinne oft ik it mei boppesteande foarstelling fan saken fan brûker Ieneach fan 'e Esk iens bin. Dat is perfoarst net sa. As op Oerlis:Bistedokterspraktyk It Griene Hert myn ynhâldlike oanmerkings ôfdien wurde mei 'belearende, bazige hâlding' en hjirboppe as 'gebrek oan algemiene omgongsfoarmen' dan is dat tsjûget dat net fan goed omgean mei tsjinspraak troch dizze behearder. Boppedat: neidat ik destiids in hânrikking die troch de wisknominaasje fan BIGH wei te heljen om de negative oerlissfear mei Ieneach te ferbetterjen bleau it stil. Dat kaam by my oer as tefreden efteroer lynjen lykas 'sa, ik ha myn syn krigen’. Dat mei sa oanfiele, mar gefolch is wol dat ik hjir net folle mear bydraach en al hielendal gjin suggestjes ferbetterings mear oandraach. Jawis, nije bydragers moatte oanmoedige wurde, mar at de besteande bydragers net serieus nomd wurde sil de Wikipedy der net folle better troch wurde. Tulp8 (oerlis) 31 mrt 2022, 11.33 (CEST)
- @Tulp8: As we dan dochs âlde kij út 'e sleat helje, dan ek mar goed. Jo binne by de diskusje op dy oerlisside binnenkommen mei de meidieling: "De side is neamd om wiske te wurden." mei gjin fierdere útlis of taljochting. Dat kin op gjin inkele manear kwalifisearre wurde as ynhâldlik op 'e saak yngean. Dêropta hawwe jo op 'e list fan siden dy't nominearre binne om wiske te wurden, by dit artikel de tekst tafoege "útlis om te wiskjen is oerstallich: de oanmakker wit dat sels ek wol, ik ferwachtsje dat hy/sy de side sels sa gau mooglik wisket." Hoe is dat net belearend en út 'e hichte? Jo besochten my as in snotjonge yn 'e hoeke te setten. Dat is wat ik bedoel mei (ynbrek op) algemiene omgongsfoarmen. Sa geane je gewoan net mei-inoar om, dus dat ik dêr lulk oer waard, hiene jo ferwachtsje kinnen. Letter, dat is wier, binne jo wol deeglik ynhâldlik op 'e saak yngien, mar dat part fan 'e diskusje is net wêr't Wutsje hjirboppe op doelde, dus dat haw ik hjir fierder bûten beskôging litten.
- Wat de rest oangiet: jo hawwe doe in diskusje oanswingele oer de fraach oft der dochs net wat regels komme moasten, bgl. oer wat as reklame sjoen wurde moat en wat net. Dêr stie ik yn prinsipe wol posityf tsjinoer, want ik begryp noch hieltyd net wêrom't dizze side net kinne soe en in side oer in like lytse en like kommersjele útjouwerij wol. Ik woe ek wol dy side ferwiderje, mitsdat dêr regels of rjochtlinen foar komme soene, of as dêr ienriedigens oer bestie ûnder de meidoggers. Dy ienriedigens wie der net. En de regels of rjochtlinen binne der net kommen om't dêr ûnder oare meidoggers/behearders gjin animo foar wie. Dat jo dy wiskwarskôging fuorthellen, haw ik net sjoen as in "moai sa, ik haw myn sin krigen" fan my, mar as in besef fan jo dat der foar jo stânpunt net genôch stipe wie. Fierders haw ik der neat efter socht. Sjoen de minne relaasje tusken ús oer dy striidkwestje, liek it my de baas om der fierder mar it swijen ta te dwaan, krekt om it gefoel by jo foar te kommen dat jo blykber likegoed krigen hawwe. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 31 mrt 2022, 13.23 (CEST)
- Q.e.d. Tulp8 (oerlis) 31 mrt 2022, 14.03 (CEST)
- Ik wit net wat dat ynhâldt. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 31 mrt 2022, 14.16 (CEST)
- Q.e.d. Tulp8 (oerlis) 31 mrt 2022, 14.03 (CEST)
- Oer dat ik "-uële" skriuwe soe: Dêr binne jo efter de tiid, Wutsje. Dat haw ik hiel lang dien, krekt nei oanlieding fan Dijkstra, dy't skriuwt: "It is dêrom oan te rieden om yn gefal fan twivel altyd wol it dielteken te brûken. Dêrmei hoedzje jo josels foar misferstannen en útspraakflaters." It liek my dêrom de baas om yn alle gefallen mei twaklanken lykas ue dy't as twa aparte klanken útsprutsen wurde moatte fan uë te skriuwen. Sûnt jo my der op wiisd hawwe dat der gjin wurden besteane mei de kombinaasje "uel" (de link fan ús petear hawwe jo sels hjirboppe tafoege), bin ik opholden fan "uële" te skriuwen. Ik haw sels in oare meidogger ûntpraat om dat te dwaan, dy't it (tink ik) fan my oernommen hie. Mar om't ik hjir al sûnt 2012 aktyf bin, sil op in soad âlde siden dy't ik bewurke haw, noch gauris uële stean, dat kin ik ek net helpe. Miskien soe in bot dêr ris oerhinne gean kinne, as immen der ferstân fan hat hoe't dat wurket.
- "It giet dochs al net geweldich mei fy:wiki." Ik begryp earlik sein net hoe't jo dêrby komme. Neffens my giet it eltse dei better. Mar meidwaan is fansels wol yn it foarste plak leafdewurk, dat jo kinne net fan meidoggers ferwachtsje dat dy har dwaande hâlde mei ûnderwerpen dy't har net ynteressearje. "Untflaterjen" hat bgl. net myn belangstelling, ik fyn dat rotwurk, dat ik sil it net gau dwaan. Ik doch wol wer oare dingen. Sa bin ik op it stuit tusken de bedriuwen troch dwaande om ferâldere artikels oer akteurs by de tiid te bringen en fan in filmografy te foarsjen.
- Reäksje op Welberry. Dat der te min meidoggers binne, dêr binne we it oer iens, en ek oer dat de behearsking fan it Frysk ûnder de jongerein op alle mooglike wizen befoardere wurde moat. Dêrfandinne ek dat ik besykje jongerein en alle oare lêzers oan it lêzen te hâlden troch se links nei in sa grut mooglik ferskaat oan oare artikels foar te setten. Mar jo kwalifikaasje as "sneu" fan myn reäksje op Welberry har skriuwen, begryp ik dan wer totaal net. It is yn myn eagen in tige betochtsume reäksje, wêryn't ik earlik de twifels útsprek oer har projekt dy't by my opkomme. Ik stel twa kwestjes oan 'e oarder: 1) Wêrom de learlingen net siden skriuwe litte oer ûnderwerpen dy't har ynteressearje? 2) Wy moatte as behearders de saak wol yn goede banen liede kinne, want as de Wikipedy oerspield wurdt troch nije artikels yn min Frysk of dêr't oare gebrekken oan sitte (hielendal gjin links, gjin kategory-yndieling of gjin ynlieding, om mar wat te neamen), dan sitte wy aansten mei de hannen yn it hier. Dat binne oprjochte soargen oer in fierders lovensweardich idee; ik sjoch net yn hoe't dat "sneu" is. Jo opmerking dat ien dy't leard hat hoe't er stikjes skriuwe moat, "fansels" ek stikjes oer oare dingen as froulju skriuwt, fyn ik wol hiel koart troch de bocht. As bern wie ik altyd wol yn in boek oan it lêzen, mar nei't ik op 'e middelbere skoalle twongen bin om literatuer mei in grutte L te lêzen foar de lêslist, haw ik sa'n tsien jier gjin boek mear iepenslein. Ik kin my sadwaande hiel goed foarstelle dat we skoalbern hjir nea wer sjogge, as se twongen wurde en skreau oer in ûnderwerp dat har neat ynteressearret.
- Jo reäksje op Kneppelfreed syn skriuwen: Jo moatte jo net ferplichte fiele om hjir mear te dwaan as wêr't jo tiid foar hawwe of wêr't jo jo noflik by fiele. Mar ik tink dat it punt fan Kneppelfreed is dat jo dan ek net kleie moatte dat oare meidoggers te min dogge. Want dat is wat dat (miskien ûnbedoeld) wol wat út jo skriuwen nei foaren liket te kommen.
Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 31 mrt 2022, 02.17 (CEST)
- Persoanlik bin ik it al mei @Wutsje: iens dat der in tal kategory-beammen te yngewikkeld binne, benammen yn de biografyske kategoryen reitsje ik noch al ris betize. Dêr mei om my de snoei skjirre ris troch hinne, mar dan al op in goede manier. Dus net lykas sa't in gemeente in gemeentlik bosk snoeit, wêrtroch't de sûne beammen en tûken om geane, en de rotte beammen en tûken stean bliuwe. Immen soe ris in fisuele útwurking meitsje moatte fan de biografyske kategory-beammen, sadat we oan de hân derfan bepale. hokker kategoryen út de beammen wei snoeid wurde kinne. FreyaSport (oerlis) 31 mrt 2022, 09.23 (CEST)
- @FreyaSport: Dêr kinne we perfoarst wolris oer hawwe, al soe ik sa foar de hân wei net sizze kinne wêr't it deade hout sit, om jo metafoar mar troch te setten. Mar dit is in oar ûnderwerp. Ik begjin hjirûnder even mei in nij kopke. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 31 mrt 2022, 16.54 (CEST)
Feminism and Folklore 2022 ends soon
[boarne bewurkje]
Feminism and Folklore 2022 which is an international writing contest organized at Wikipedia ends soon that is on 31 March 2022 11:59 UTC. This is the last chance of the year to write about feminism, women biographies and gender-focused topics such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, fairy tales, folk plays, folk arts, folk religion, mythology, folk artists, folk dancers, folk singers, folk musicians, folk game athletes, women in mythology, women warriors in folklore, witches and witch hunting, fairy tales and more
Keep an eye on the project page for declaration of Winners.
We look forward for your immense co-operation.
Thanks Wiki Loves Folklore international Team MediaWiki message delivery (oerlis) 26 mrt 2022, 15.28 (CET)
Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines ratification voting is now closed
[boarne bewurkje]Greetings,
The ratification voting process for the revised enforcement guidelines of the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) came to a close on 21 March 2022. Over 2300 Wikimedians voted across different regions of our movement. Thank you to everyone who participated in this process! The scrutinizing group is now reviewing the vote for accuracy, so please allow up to two weeks for them to finish their work.
The final results from the voting process will be announced here, along with the relevant statistics and a summary of comments as soon as they are available. Please check out the voter information page to learn about the next steps. You can comment on the project talk page on Meta-wiki in any language. You may also contact the UCoC project team by email: ucocprojectwikimedia.org
Best regards,
Movement Strategy and Governance
Xeno (WMF) 30 mrt 2022, 03.53 (CEST)
Kategory-yndieling
[boarne bewurkje]Ik haw op fersyk fan @FreyaSport: de kategory-yndieling foar biografyen ris útskreaun. Ik haw dêrfoar de "beam" fan Nederlânsk persoan nommen, om't dy it meast ûntwikkele is, tink ik. Ik haw de Fryske kategoryen, dy't ek by dizze yndieling ynsitte, weilitten, om't dy de "Nederlânske yndieling" spegelje en dus neat tafoegje oan it begryp fan 'e yndieling. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 31 mrt 2022, 17.05 (CEST)
- De betiizing begjint by my, by de ensf. kategoryen, bygelyks (Ingelsktalich Kebekaansk persoan) as (Nederlânsk persoan fan Joadsk komôf). Nei myn persoanlike miening soene yn in tal fan dat soarte kategoryen in snoeiskjirre set wurde kinne. FreyaSport (oerlis) 31 mrt 2022, 18.32 (CEST)
- O. Dat is no krekt in diel fan 'e kategory-yndieling dêr't ik wiis mei bin. Wat fine jo dêr dan betiizjend oan? Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 31 mrt 2022, 18.51 (CEST)
|
Gemeenten yn Súd-Hollãn
[boarne bewurkje]As reaksje op Oerlis:Hendrik-Ido-Ambacht, wolle jo hjir efkes nei sjen: Súd-Hollân#Gemeenten en Berjocht:GemeentenSúd-Hollân. Ranbovw (oerlis) 7 apr 2022, 11.13 (CEST)
- Ik haw der even nei sjoen en wat feroarings trochfierd. Sa moat it goed wêze.
- Even foar jo begryp: we hawwe hjir in pear jier lyn in langrinnende diskusje hân oer it ferfryskjen fan plaknammen bûten Fryslân. Der is doe besletten om dêr mar ris in ynventarisaasje fan te meitsjen en der kritysk nei te sjen. We hawwe der doe in stimming oer holden en dêrby binne hiel soad ferfryskings derút smiten dy't inkeld yn 'e Wikipedy brûkt waarden. (Hjir en dêr, sa't jo murken hawwe, komme je dêr lykwols noch keppelings fan tsjin.) As resultaat fan 'e stimming is der in list opsteld (Wikipedy:List fan ferfryske plaknammen bûten Fryslân).
- Om't út dy list de ferfryskings út wei litten binne dêr't we it ynearsten net oer iens wurde koene, is de list lykwols noch net alhiel folslein. Der soe noch fierdere diskusje plakfine, mar eltsenien hie eins syn nocht fan it ûnderwerp, dat dêr is it nea fan kommen. Dat betsjut dat de twifelgefallen stean bleaun binne yn 'e foarm (ferfryske of net) dy't se op it stuit fan 'e stimming hiene. Dêrom haw ik no bgl. Foarburch oan 'e list tafoege, dat by de stimming twa stimmen foar (ferfrysking) en twa tsjin krigen hie. Sa't mei de diskusje oer Hendrik-Ido-Ambacht bleken is, bestiet der gjin animo om oer dit ûnderwerp troch te diskusjearjen, dat dan litte we it sa't it is.
- No giet it by de list en de stimming allinne om plaknammen. Wat gemeentenammen oangiet, moat eltsenien wat syn sûne ferstân brûke. De gemeentenamme Westfoarne wurdt fansels ferfryske om't it plak Eastfoarne yn 'e list opnommen is. It liket my ek logysk dat Lansingerland Lansingerlân wurdt. Wat fierders noch opkaam, wie Capelle oan de Isel. Dat plak stie net yn 'e list, mar we hiene wol Krimpen oan de Isel en Alfen oan de Ryn, dat it liket my logysk om 'e riviernamme al te ferfryskjen en net ynienen oer Capelle aan den IJssel te begjinnen. Ik hoopje dat jo wat oan dit stikje útlis hawwe. Groetnis, Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 7 apr 2022, 21.50 (CEST)
Brumado
[boarne bewurkje]Hello! Someone created the article Brumado (Q1808298) on the Gagauz Wikipedia, but I figured out it was in Frisian. Considering there is no respective article about the subject here, I've pasted the contents to Meidogger:Styyx/Brumado. Since I'm not fluent in Frisian, I'm not sure if it is machine translation or not, so I decided to not create the article, but rather ask here so you guys can confirm it's something readable and move it to the mainspace. Please delete the subpage after making a decision. Thanks! Styyx (oerlis) 11 apr 2022, 20.05 (CEST)
- @Styyx: Hello, Styyx. It turns out it was a machine translation and barely readable, such awful mistakes in every sentence that we would have had to rewrite the whole thing, so we threw it out. Still, thanks for bringing this to our attention. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 11 apr 2022, 23.01 (CEST)
Movement Strategy and Governance News – Issue 6
[boarne bewurkje]Movement Strategy and Governance News
Issue 6, April 2022Read the full newsletter
Welcome to the sixth issue of Movement Strategy and Governance News! This revamped newsletter distributes relevant news and events about the Movement Charter, Universal Code of Conduct, Movement Strategy Implementation grants, Board of trustees elections and other relevant MSG topics.
This Newsletter will be distributed quarterly, while the more frequent Updates will also be delivered weekly. Please remember to subscribe here if you would like to receive future issues of this newsletter.
- Leadership Development - A Working Group is Forming! - The application to join the Leadership Development Working Group closed on April 10th, 2022, and up to 12 community members will be selected to participate in the working group. (continue reading)
- Universal Code of Conduct Ratification Results are out! - The global decision process on the enforcement of the UCoC via SecurePoll was held from 7 to 21 March. Over 2,300 eligible voters from at least 128 different home projects submitted their opinions and comments. (continue reading)
- Movement Discussions on Hubs - The Global Conversation event on Regional and Thematic Hubs was held on Saturday, March 12, and was attended by 84 diverse Wikimedians from across the movement. (continue reading)
- Movement Strategy Grants Remain Open! - Since the start of the year, six proposals with a total value of about $80,000 USD have been approved. Do you have a movement strategy project idea? Reach out to us! (continue reading)
- The Movement Charter Drafting Committee is All Set! - The Committee of fifteen members which was elected in October 2021, has agreed on the essential values and methods for its work, and has started to create the outline of the Movement Charter draft. (continue reading)
- Introducing Movement Strategy Weekly - Contribute and Subscribe! - The MSG team have just launched the updates portal, which is connected to the various Movement Strategy pages on Meta-wiki. Subscriber to get up-to-date news about the various ongoing projects. (continue reading)
- Diff Blogs - Check out the most recent publications about Movement Strategy on Wikimedia Diff. (continue reading)
Also, a draft of the 2022-23 Wikimedia Foundation Annual Plan has been published. Input is being sought on-wiki and during several conversations with Wikimedia Foundation CEO Maryana Iskander.
See full announcement on Meta-wiki. Xeno (WMF) 22 apr 2022, 03.45 (CEST)
New Wikipedia Library Collections Available Now - April 2022
[boarne bewurkje]Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library has free access to new paywalled reliable sources. You can these and dozens more collections at https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/:
- Wiley – journals, books, and research resources, covering life, health, social, and physical sciences
- OECD – OECD iLibrary, Data, and Multimedia published by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
- SPIE Digital Library – journals and eBooks on optics and photonics applied research
Many other sources are freely available for experienced editors, including collections which recently became accessible to all eligible editors: Cambridge University Press, BMJ, AAAS, Érudit and more.
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: log in today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 26 apr 2022, 15.16 (CEST)
- This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.
Coming soon: Improvements for templates
[boarne bewurkje]Hello, more changes around templates are coming to your wiki soon:
The template dialog in VisualEditor and in the 2017 Wikitext Editor (beta) will be improved fundamentally: This should help users understand better what the template expects, how to navigate the template, and how to add parameters.
In syntax highlighting (CodeMirror extension), you can activate a colorblind-friendly color scheme with a user setting.
Deployment is planned for May 10. This is the last set of improvements from WMDE Technical Wishes' focus area “Templates”.
We would love to hear your feedback on our talk pages!
-- Johanna Strodt (WMDE) 29 apr 2022, 13.13 (CEST)
Editing news 2022 #1
[boarne bewurkje]Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at the 20 Wikipedias that participated in the test. You will be able to turn it off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
Whatamidoing (WMF) 2 mai 2022, 20.55 (CEST)
2022 Board of Trustees Call for Candidates
[boarne bewurkje]The Board of Trustees seeks candidates for the 2022 Board of Trustees election. Read more on Meta-wiki.
The 2022 Board of Trustees election is here! Please consider submitting your candidacy to serve on the Board of Trustees.
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees oversees the Wikimedia Foundation's operations. Community-and-affiliate selected trustees and Board-appointed trustees make up the Board of Trustees. Each trustee serves a three year term. The Wikimedia community has the opportunity to vote for community-and-affiliate selected trustees.
The Wikimedia community will vote to fill two seats on the Board in 2022. This is an opportunity to improve the representation, diversity, and expertise of the Board as a team.
- Who are potential candidates? Are you a potential candidate? Find out more on the Apply to be a Candidate page.
Thank you for your support,
Movement Strategy and Governance on behalf of the Elections Committee and the Board of Trustees
10 mai 2022, 12.39 (CEST)
Kategory:Japansk fuotballer
[boarne bewurkje]We ha hjir op de Fryske Wikipedy de Kategory:Japansk fuotballer mei 544 japanske fuotballers wêrfan sa'n 500 net al te ensyklopedysk binne foar de Fryske Wikipedy. De artikels besteane faaks ek mar út ien sin. It probleem is dat dat it der 544 binne en ik net by fersin in fuotballer by it jiskefet sette wol dy't al Ensyklopedysk is foar de Fryske Wikipedy. FreyaSport (oerlis) 19 mai 2022, 21.36 (CEST)
- Dei, ja der stiet net al te folle by. Ast by de oare wiki's sjochst, steane dêr ek net allegear in soad sinnen by. Ik fyn it ek wol wat begrutlik om se allegear fuort te smiten. As der immen is dy't der in bytsje oan taheakje wol... Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 26 mai 2022, 03.56 (CEST)
Identiteit veurvechter Friese tael
[boarne bewurkje]Moi lu,
ik schrieve gien Fries, mor hoop dat Stellingwarfs hier voldot. Veur zo'n twintig jaor ha'k een boek in haanden mit schriefsels van of over een veurvechter van de Friese tael, die zo end 19de, begun 20ste ieuw leefde. Et ienige wa'k mi'j herinnere, is da'k las dat hi'j mit zien (homo)seksuele geaordheid niet uut de voeten kon, en daoromme (al as jongkerel) zien passie en energie wi'jdde an de zaeke van de Friese tael. Ik vraoge mi'j now of wie of dat ewest kan hebben, en heb hom nog niet weerommevunden. Hef der iene een idee? Ik leze wél Fries. Ni'jluuseger (oerlis) 26 mai 2022, 02.27 (CEST)
- Goeie. Dat seit my sa neat, mar jo soene sels ris even omsneupe kinne yn ús kategoryen Kategory:Frysk taalaktivist en Kategory:Frisiast. As jo him dêr net fine kinne, dan soe ik it fieder ek net witte. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 26 mai 2022, 02.45 (CEST)
- Danke! Die liesies bin'k al ies bi'jlanges egaone, mor lou loene, veurasnog. Ik heb een mailtien naor de Fryske Akademy edaone; lichtkaans dat d'r daor iene een lochien opgaot. Ni'jluuseger (oerlis) 26 mai 2022, 12.54 (CEST)
- Goeie. It docht my tinken oan Douwe Kalma. Drewes (oerlis) 26 mai 2022, 13.19 (CEST)
- Dank - kan wezen, of aans ok Obe Postma. Mor et boek gonk warschienlik over Kalma. Ni'jluuseger (oerlis) 26 mai 2022, 16.14 (CEST)
- Obe Postma soe wolris kinne. Ik wit fan him dat er homoseksueel wie. --Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 26 mai 2022, 21.17 (CEST)
- Dank - kan wezen, of aans ok Obe Postma. Mor et boek gonk warschienlik over Kalma. Ni'jluuseger (oerlis) 26 mai 2022, 16.14 (CEST)
- Goeie. It docht my tinken oan Douwe Kalma. Drewes (oerlis) 26 mai 2022, 13.19 (CEST)
- Danke! Die liesies bin'k al ies bi'jlanges egaone, mor lou loene, veurasnog. Ik heb een mailtien naor de Fryske Akademy edaone; lichtkaans dat d'r daor iene een lochien opgaot. Ni'jluuseger (oerlis) 26 mai 2022, 12.54 (CEST)
Revisions to the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) Enforcement Guidelines
[boarne bewurkje]Hello all,
We'd like to provide an update on the work on the Enforcement Guidelines for the Universal Code of Conduct. After the conclusion of the community vote on the guidelines in March, the Community Affairs committee (CAC) of the Board asked that several areas of the guidelines be reviewed for improvements before the Board does its final review. These areas were identified based on community discussions and comments provided during the vote. The CAC also requested review of the controversial Note in 3.1 of the UCoC itself.
Once more, a big thank you to all who voted, especially to all who left constructive feedback and comments! The project team is working with the Board to establish a timeline for this work, and will communicate this next month.
Members of the two prior UCoC Drafting Committees have generously offered their time to help shape improvements to the Guidelines. You can read more about them and their work here, as well as read summaries of their weekly meetings in 2022.
Wikimedians have provided many valuable comments together with the vote and in other conversations. Given the size and diversity of the Wikimedia community, there are even more voices out there who can give ideas on how to improve the enforcement guidelines and add even more valuable ideas to the process. To help the Revisions committee identify improvements, input on several questions for the committee’s review is requested. Visit the Meta-wiki pages (Enforcement Guidelines revision discussions, Policy text revision discussions) to get your ideas to the Committee - it is very important that viewpoints are heard from different communities before the Committee begins drafting revision proposals.
On behalf of the UCoC project team
Xeno (WMF) 4 jun 2022, 00.56 (CEST)
Do you want automatic templates from Wikidata?
[boarne bewurkje]Hello! Sorry for writing this in English. I'm User:Theklan from the Basque Wikipedia. Some of you may know that we are doing a project with Frisian, Irish and Basque schools to write articles about women in Wikipedia. The project is coordinated by AFUK. In the next weeks we will have teachers here to explain them how Wikipedia works, and we have noted that you don't have automatic templates from Wikidata. If you want, we can help with this, and I can deploy it in a couple of hours, but I would need community approval or interest. If you want to see how these templates work, you can see a good example with eu:Mata Hari. All the template is populated from Wikidata. Don't hesitate in contacting me if you have any question. (Carbon copy: User:Smirkybec). Theklan (oerlis) 17 jun 2022, 11.05 (CEST)
- Wat binne automatic templates ek wer? Drewes (oerlis) 17 jun 2022, 17.23 (CEST)
- @Theklan, Drewes, en Kneppelfreed: Hello, Theklan. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "automatic templates", but I suspect that it's about infoboxes being filled automatically with info from Wikidata? If so, we do have that possibility here, see for instance Ludwik Lejzer Zamenhof and Blade Runner. But we almost never use it. Personally, I don't understand why any Wikipedia would hand over a part of its independence to Wikidata in this way. It's not that much trouble to fill in an infobox, and then you know it's done right. Apart from the independence issue, if you import info from Wikidata, you get strange things. For instance, it says in the infobox on Zamenhof that he was (among other things) a poëet, which is a completely obsolete word which sound ridiculous in modern Frisian. The real word is dichter, and if you look at the item "poet" on Wikidata, you see that the Frisian entry there is indeed called dichter, so where do they come up with poëet? These kinds of things really make me not like this system. So, again assuming that this is what you mean, it's a hard no from me. Thank you for your kind offer, though. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 18 jun 2022, 22.03 (CEST)
- Thanks for the answers. The word 'poëet' comes from the description in Wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q49757. Once you change there poëet for dichter it gets changed at every page it includes the item, so you have to make less work to get it right. I understand the idea of being fully independent of Wikidata (I disagree, but that's not the point), but from our experience the edition gets easier for newcomers, and you don't need to spend time updating articles, for example when someone dies, or the population of a place changes (or the mayor, whatever you are taking from Wikidata). So the idea is to make things easier. Nevertheless, if you don't want to do it, then we will explain students and teachers from Friesland how to property add information into the templates. Theklan (oerlis) 19 jun 2022, 08.52 (CEST)
- I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean by "change the description". I can't find the word "poëet" anywhere on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q49757 except in the "also known as" section for Dutch, but surely that's not what you mean. If I can't find it, I can't change it, ergo: the system doesn't work. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 21 jun 2022, 01.21 (CEST)
- I have posted a capture of where it is: https://postimg.cc/F1X3Ld4J. You have it up, in the language descriptions. Theklan (oerlis) 22 jun 2022, 15.22 (CEST)
- I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean by "change the description". I can't find the word "poëet" anywhere on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q49757 except in the "also known as" section for Dutch, but surely that's not what you mean. If I can't find it, I can't change it, ergo: the system doesn't work. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 21 jun 2022, 01.21 (CEST)
- Thanks for the answers. The word 'poëet' comes from the description in Wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q49757. Once you change there poëet for dichter it gets changed at every page it includes the item, so you have to make less work to get it right. I understand the idea of being fully independent of Wikidata (I disagree, but that's not the point), but from our experience the edition gets easier for newcomers, and you don't need to spend time updating articles, for example when someone dies, or the population of a place changes (or the mayor, whatever you are taking from Wikidata). So the idea is to make things easier. Nevertheless, if you don't want to do it, then we will explain students and teachers from Friesland how to property add information into the templates. Theklan (oerlis) 19 jun 2022, 08.52 (CEST)
- @Theklan, Drewes, en Kneppelfreed: Hello, Theklan. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "automatic templates", but I suspect that it's about infoboxes being filled automatically with info from Wikidata? If so, we do have that possibility here, see for instance Ludwik Lejzer Zamenhof and Blade Runner. But we almost never use it. Personally, I don't understand why any Wikipedia would hand over a part of its independence to Wikidata in this way. It's not that much trouble to fill in an infobox, and then you know it's done right. Apart from the independence issue, if you import info from Wikidata, you get strange things. For instance, it says in the infobox on Zamenhof that he was (among other things) a poëet, which is a completely obsolete word which sound ridiculous in modern Frisian. The real word is dichter, and if you look at the item "poet" on Wikidata, you see that the Frisian entry there is indeed called dichter, so where do they come up with poëet? These kinds of things really make me not like this system. So, again assuming that this is what you mean, it's a hard no from me. Thank you for your kind offer, though. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 18 jun 2022, 22.03 (CEST)
Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 is out!
[boarne bewurkje]Please help translate to your language
Hi, Greetings
The winners for Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 is announced!
We are happy to share with you winning images for this year's edition. This year saw over 8,584 images represented on commons in over 92 countries. Kindly see images here
Our profound gratitude to all the people who participated and organized local contests and photo walks for this project.
We hope to have you contribute to the campaign next year.
Thank you,
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team
--MediaWiki message delivery (oerlis) 4 jul 2022, 18.12 (CEST)
Propose statements for the 2022 Election Compass
[boarne bewurkje]Hi all,
Community members in the 2022 Board of Trustees election are invited to propose statements to use in the Election Compass.
An Election Compass is a tool to help voters select the candidates that best align with their beliefs and views. The community members will propose statements for the candidates to answer using a Lickert scale (agree/neutral/disagree). The candidates’ answers to the statements will be loaded into the Election Compass tool. Voters will use the tool by entering in their answer to the statements (agree/disagree/neutral). The results will show the candidates that best align with the voter’s beliefs and views.
- Here is the timeline for the Election Compass
- July 8 - 20: Community members propose statements for the Election Compass
- July 21 - 22: Elections Committee reviews statements for clarity and removes off-topic statements
- July 23 - August 1: Volunteers vote on the statements
- August 2 - 4: Elections Committee selects the top 15 statements
- August 5 - 12: candidates align themselves with the statements
- August 15: The Election Compass opens for voters to use to help guide their voting decision
The Elections Committee will select the top 15 statements at the beginning of August. The Elections Committee will oversee the process, supported by the Movement Strategy and Governance team. MSG will check that the questions are clear, there are no duplicates, no typos, and so on.
Best,
Movement Strategy and Governance
This message was sent on behalf of the Board Selection Task Force and the Elections Committee
MNadzikiewicz (WMF) (talk) 14 jul 2022, 13.34 (CEST)
Movement Strategy and Governance News – Issue 7
[boarne bewurkje]Movement Strategy and Governance News
Issue 7, July-September 2022Read the full newsletter
Welcome to the 7th issue of Movement Strategy and Governance News! The newsletter distributes relevant news and events about the implementation of Wikimedia's Movement Strategy recommendations, other relevant topics regarding Movement governance, as well as different projects and activities supported by the Movement Strategy and Governance (MSG) team of the Wikimedia Foundation.
The MSG Newsletter is delivered quarterly, while the more frequent Movement Strategy Weekly will be delivered weekly. Please remember to subscribe here if you would like to receive future issues of this newsletter.
- Movement sustainability: Wikimedia Foundation's annual sustainability report has been published. (continue reading)
- Improving user experience: recent improvements on the desktop interface for Wikimedia projects. (continue reading)
- Safety and inclusion: updates on the revision process of the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines. (continue reading)
- Equity in decisionmaking: reports from Hubs pilots conversations, recent progress from the Movement Charter Drafting Committee, and a new white paper for futures of participation in the Wikimedia movement. (continue reading)
- Stakeholders coordination: launch of a helpdesk for Affiliates and volunteer communities working on content partnership. (continue reading)
- Leadership development: updates on leadership projects by Wikimedia movement organizers in Brazil and Cape Verde. (continue reading)
- Internal knowledge management: launch of a new portal for technical documentation and community resources. (continue reading)
- Innovate in free knowledge: high-quality audiovisual resources for scientific experiments and a new toolkit to record oral transcripts. (continue reading)
- Evaluate, iterate, and adapt: results from the Equity Landscape project pilot (continue reading)
- Other news and updates: a new forum to discuss Movement Strategy implementation, upcoming Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees election, a new podcast to discuss Movement Strategy, and change of personnel for the Foundation's Movement Strategy and Governance team. (continue reading)
Thank you for reading! RamzyM (WMF) 18 jul 2022, 03.37 (CEST)
Announcing the six candidates for the 2022 Board of Trustees election
[boarne bewurkje]Hi everyone,
The Affiliate voting process has concluded. Representatives from each Affiliate organization learned about the candidates by reading candidates’ statements, reviewing candidates’ answers to questions, and considering the candidates’ ratings provided by the Analysis Committee. The selected 2022 Board of Trustees candidates are:
- Tobechukwu Precious Friday (Tochiprecious)
- Farah Jack Mustaklem (Fjmustak)
- Shani Evenstein Sigalov (Esh77)
- Kunal Mehta (Legoktm)
- Michał Buczyński (Aegis Maelstrom)
- Mike Peel (Mike Peel)
You may see more information about the Results and Statistics of this Board election.
Please take a moment to appreciate the Affiliate Representatives and Analysis Committee members for taking part in this process and helping to grow the Board of Trustees in capacity and diversity. These hours of volunteer work connect us across understanding and perspective. Thank you for your participation.
Thank you to the community members who put themselves forward as candidates for the Board of Trustees. Considering joining the Board of Trustees is no small decision. The time and dedication candidates have shown to this point speaks to their commitment to this movement. Congratulations to those candidates who have been selected. A great amount of appreciation and gratitude for those candidates not selected. Please continue to share your leadership with Wikimedia.
Thank you to those who followed the Affiliate process for this Board election. You may review the results of the Affiliate selection process.
The next part of the Board election process is the community voting period. You may view the Board election timeline here. To prepare for the community voting period, there are several things community members can engage with in the following ways:
- Read candidates’ statements and read the candidates’ answers to the questions posed by the Affiliate Representatives.
- Propose and select the 6 questions for candidates to answer during their video Q&A.
- See the Analysis Committee’s ratings of candidates on each candidate’s statement.
- Propose statements for the Election Compass voters can use to find which candidates best fit their principles.
- Encourage others in your community to take part in the election.
Best,
Movement Strategy and Governance
This message was sent on behalf of the Board Selection Task Force and the Elections Committee
MNadzikiewicz (WMF) 27 jul 2022, 16.03 (CEST)
WikiWomen?
[boarne bewurkje]Goeiedei,
Yn maart 2022 waard hjir op 'e oerlisside in berjocht pleatst oer it projekt WikiWomen. Om it projekt te fasilitearjen hawwe wy in aparte projektside opset mei de namme Froulju sûnder side. No sjoch ik op 'e webside fan 'e Afûk dat der acht Friezen yn Baskelân wienen foar (ûnder oaren) in Wikipediatraining. Foar de meiwurkers fan 'e Afûk, it Mercator Europeesk Kennissintrum en de Learning Hub Fryslân set ik hjirûnder in pear ferwizingen del, want der is genôch ynformaasje beskikber foar nije potinsjele skriuwers/meidoggers:
- Ynformaasje foar nije skriuwers: Wikipedy:Mienskip/Meidwaan en ferbetterje
- Ingelsktalige ynformaasje foar nije skriuwers: [1]
- YouTube turorial, sykje op How to Make a Wikipedia Page
Fierders freegje ik my ôf oft der ek ien kontakt hat mei dit WikiWomen projekt? Ik hear niks mear fan se. Kening Aldgilles (oerlis) 27 jul 2022, 16.08 (CEST)
Vote for Election Compass Statements
[boarne bewurkje]Hi all,
Volunteers in the 2022 Board of Trustees election are invited to vote for statements to use in the Election Compass. You can vote for the statements you would like to see included in the Election Compass on Meta-wiki.
An Election Compass is a tool to help voters select the candidates that best align with their beliefs and views. The community members will propose statements for the candidates to answer using a Lickert scale (agree/neutral/disagree). The candidates’ answers to the statements will be loaded into the Election Compass tool. Voters will use the tool by entering in their answer to the statements (agree/disagree/neutral). The results will show the candidates that best align with the voter’s beliefs and views.
Here is the timeline for the Election Compass:
July 8 - 20: Volunteers propose statements for the Election CompassJuly 21 - 22: Elections Committee reviews statements for clarity and removes off-topic statements- July 23 - August 1: Volunteers vote on the statements
- August 2 - 4: Elections Committee selects the top 15 statements
- August 5 - 12: candidates align themselves with the statements
- August 15: The Election Compass opens for voters to use to help guide their voting decision
The Elections Committee will select the top 15 statements at the beginning of August
Best,
Movement Strategy and Governance
This message was sent on behalf of the Board Selection Task Force and the Elections Committee
MNadzikiewicz (WMF) 27 jul 2022, 23.01 (CEST)
The 2022 Board of Trustees election Community Voting period is now open
[boarne bewurkje]Hi everyone,
The Community Voting period for the 2022 Board of Trustees election is now open. Here are some helpful links to get you the information you need to vote:
- Try the Election Compass, showing how candidates stand on 15 different topics.
- Read the candidate statements and answers to Affiliate questions
- Learn more about the skills the Board seeks and how the Analysis Committee found candidates align with those skills
If you are ready to vote, you may go to SecurePoll voting page to vote now. You may vote from August 23 at 00:00 UTC to September 6 at 23:59 UTC. To see about your voter eligibility, please visit the voter eligibility page.
Best,
Movement Strategy and Governance
This message was sent on behalf of the Board Selection Task Force and the Elections Committee
Invitation to join the Movement Strategy Forum
[boarne bewurkje]Hello everyone,
The Movement Strategy Forum (MS Forum) is a multilingual collaborative space for all conversations about Movement Strategy implementation.
We are inviting all Movement participants to collaborate on the MS Forum. The goal of the forum is to build community collaboration, using an inclusive multilingual platform.
The Movement Strategy is a collaborative effort to imagine and build the future of the Wikimedia Movement. Anyone can contribute to the Movement Strategy, from a comment to a full-time project.
- Join this forum with your Wikimedia account, engage in conversations, and ask questions in your language.
The Movement Strategy and Governance team (MSG) launched the proposal for the MS Forum in May 2022. There was a 2-month community review period, which ended on 24 July 2022. The community review process included several questions that resulted in interesting conversations. You can read the Community Review Report.
We look forward to seeing you at the MS Forum!
Best regards,
the Movement Strategy and Governance Team
User:MNadzikiewicz (WMF) 29 aug 2022, 13.32 (CEST)
20-jarig bestaan Wikipedy
[boarne bewurkje]Dag,
Ik ben Martijn van Dijk van de Leeuwarder Courant, kan ik met een van de beheerders in contact komen over het 20-jarig bestaan van Wikipedy?
Mijn contactgegevens: martijn.van.dijk (apenstaartje) mediahuisnoord.nl.
mei freonlike groetnis,
Martijn Sinenwille (oerlis) 30 aug 2022, 17.09 (CEST)
- @Kening Aldgilles, Wutsje, Ieneach fan 'e Esk, Kneppelfreed, Mysha, FreyaSport, en RomkeHoekstra: en oaren. Wat sille en wolle wy mei boppesteande? Drewes (oerlis) 30 aug 2022, 18.54 (CEST)
- Ik nim oan dat it Martijn van Dijk om in fraachpetear oer Wikipedy te dwaan is en tink dat soks dan oan jo of oan Ieneach is as immen fan jim dêr nocht oan hat. Soe tink wol moai wêze, want sa kriget Wikipedy wat omtinken en dat is altiten wolkom. Mar jim moatte der sels ek niget oan ha fansels. --RomkeHoekstra (oerlis) 30 aug 2022, 19.25 (CEST)
- We soene sjen kinne wat er krekt wol. As de Fryske wikipedy wat mear omtinken kriget soe yndie moai wêze, want ik tink in hiel soad Friezen witte suver net as der in Fryske wikipedy is want de measten dy't ik ken rieplachtsje de Nederlânsktalige. Mar oan oare kant wol ik myn anonimiteit ek net bleatlizze. Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 30 aug 2022, 19.51 (CEST)
- @Drewes, Kneppelfreed, Mysha, FreyaSport, en RomkeHoekstra: Van Dijk hat ek al kontakt opnommen mei Wikimedia Nederlân, om't er mei ús gjin kontakt krije kinne soe. Ik haw jierren lyn ris gedoente hân mei Wikimedia Nederlân, dat dêr kenne se my, en sadwaande is dat fia-fia wer oer de e-mail nei my weromkeppele. Dat wie fan 'e middei om 17.40, dus in healoere nei't er syn berjocht hjir delset hie. Fûn ik wat foarbarich, mar op Frysktalige Wikipedy lês ik dat it projekt op 2 septimber 2002 úteinset is, dus hy sil syn stikje noch wol yn 'e krante fan 2 septimber o.s. hawwe wolle.
- Sa'n stikje yn 'e krante soe moai wêze foar de Wikipedy, mar persoanlik haw ik der net folle nocht oan. Ik wol likemin as Kneppelfreed mei namme en tanamme yn 'e krante. No set er hjirboppe in e-mailadres del, mar as je him in mailtsje stjoere is jins namme daliks al bekend, teminsten, myn e-mail stiet op myn eigen namme en net op dy fan Ieneach fan 'e Esk. Is der ek ien yn ús fermidden dy't dêr neat om jout? Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 30 aug 2022, 20.03 (CEST)
- Ik lês op Wikipedy:Parseberjocht dat Mysha de parsekontakten docht. Wit net hoe âld oft dy ynformaasje is, mar ik sil ris in berjochtsje op syn oerlisside sette. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 30 aug 2022, 20.11 (CEST)
- Ik haw hjir ris in nachtsje oer sliept en it yn my omgean litten, mar ik haw besletten dat ik yn elts gefal net oan it ynterview meiwurkje sil. Dus as der gjin oaren binne dy't Van Dijk fan tsjinst wêze wolle, dan moatte we it mar ôfsizze. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 1 sep 2022, 01.08 (CEST)
- Ik haw der ek net folle ferlet fan. Kreksa as Ieneach seit as ik him in email stjoere sil is daliks myn namme bekend en dat soe ik leaver net wolle. It muoit my tige, want de Wikipedy kin wol wat omtinken brûke, mar faaks is der in oare manier. --Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 1 sep 2022, 03.31 (CEST)
- @Kneppelfreed: As jo fierders wol belangstelling hawwe om oan it ynterview mei te wurkjen, soene jo ris besykje kinne mei de man yn kontakt te kommen fia Meidogger oerlis:Sinenwille, syn oerlisside hjirre op 'e Wikipedy. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 1 sep 2022, 22.00 (CEST)
- Ik haw op syn oerlisside frege wat er woe, dus mar even ôfwachtsje wat er wol. Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 3 sep 2022, 03.25 (CEST)
- Ik haw gjin idee wa at nei myn postadres stjoerd hat, mar ik hie it net sjoen. Ik wie ek wat drok hjir, dat ik hie it op dat stuit ek net dwaan kind. Myn namme stiet gewoan op myn meidogside, dat ik haw der net sa'n probleem mei. Wat ik sizze moat is wat oars: It liket dat it oansjen fan de Wikipedy koartlyn ferminbettert is. Wat is yn it miene de opfetting deroer? En it skynt wy binne 210 siden fuort fan ús feestke. Wolle wy dêr noch wat mei? Mysha (oerlis
- @Mysha:, Ieneach hat in berjocht foar jo efterlitten op jo oerlisside. Jo kinne hjir ris sjen oer dat ynterview. Martijn fan de Ljouwerter Krante woe in ynterview dwaan. De measten fan ús fiele dêr net folle foar, want dat soe ús út 'e anonimiteit bringe. It leafst wol ik dat sa hâlde. Op Wikipedy:Parseberjocht stiet dat jo parseberjochten dogge. Soe dit wat foar jo wêze? --Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 16 nov 2022, 20.05 (CET)
- Ik haw gjin idee wa at nei myn postadres stjoerd hat, mar ik hie it net sjoen. Ik wie ek wat drok hjir, dat ik hie it op dat stuit ek net dwaan kind. Myn namme stiet gewoan op myn meidogside, dat ik haw der net sa'n probleem mei. Wat ik sizze moat is wat oars: It liket dat it oansjen fan de Wikipedy koartlyn ferminbettert is. Wat is yn it miene de opfetting deroer? En it skynt wy binne 210 siden fuort fan ús feestke. Wolle wy dêr noch wat mei? Mysha (oerlis
- Ik haw op syn oerlisside frege wat er woe, dus mar even ôfwachtsje wat er wol. Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 3 sep 2022, 03.25 (CEST)
- @Kneppelfreed: As jo fierders wol belangstelling hawwe om oan it ynterview mei te wurkjen, soene jo ris besykje kinne mei de man yn kontakt te kommen fia Meidogger oerlis:Sinenwille, syn oerlisside hjirre op 'e Wikipedy. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 1 sep 2022, 22.00 (CEST)
- Ik haw der ek net folle ferlet fan. Kreksa as Ieneach seit as ik him in email stjoere sil is daliks myn namme bekend en dat soe ik leaver net wolle. It muoit my tige, want de Wikipedy kin wol wat omtinken brûke, mar faaks is der in oare manier. --Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 1 sep 2022, 03.31 (CEST)
- Ja de wikipedy hat in nij oansjen krigen. Dat is lykwols bûten ús om gien. Jo kinne by "ynstellings", rjochts boppe oan op it skerm it âlde oansjen wer ynstelle.--Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 16 nov 2022, 20.05 (CET)
- Lês der alles oer op dizze side ûnder it kopke The Vector 2022 skin as the default in two weeks?. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 16 nov 2022, 23.08 (CET)
- Ja de wikipedy hat in nij oansjen krigen. Dat is lykwols bûten ús om gien. Jo kinne by "ynstellings", rjochts boppe oan op it skerm it âlde oansjen wer ynstelle.--Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 16 nov 2022, 20.05 (CET)
Mediatraining
[boarne bewurkje]Wikimedia Nederland wordt regelmatig benaderd door journalisten voor interviews of gevraagd te koppelen aan een of meerdere vrijwilligers om te interviewen over (Friese) Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata... Ter voorbereiding bieden we deze Wikimedianen graag een mediatraining aan. De training zal ergens in het najaar plaatsvinden, circa 1 dag in beslag nemen en verzorgd worden door een extern bureau op het kantoor van Wikimedia Nederland in Utrecht. Mocht je interesse hebben om deel te nemen, wil je mij dan svp vóór 19 september een mailtje sturen (cox@wikimedia.nll)? Germien Cox (oerlis) 5 sep 2022, 12.39 (CEST)
- @Germien Cox: Een aanvraag voor een interview komt hier maar zo zelden voor (dit is de eerste keer in mijn tienjarige 'loopbaan' hier), dat ik vermoed dat er onder de gebruikers van de Wikipedy niet veel animo zal zijn voor deze cursus. Desalniettemin stellen wij, als ik even voor alle gebruikers mag spreken, het meedenken van Wikimedia Nederland in deze zaak zeer op prijs. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 5 sep 2022, 23.07 (CEST) Drewes (oerlis) 6 sep 2022, 12.25 (CEST), Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 6 sep 2022, 18.53 (CEST)
- Dank voor de snelle reactie. Mocht iemand zich bedenken hoor ik het graag en kijken we graag wat we kunnen doen. Germien Cox (oerlis) 13 sep 2022, 13.43 (CEST)
- As parsekontakt hie it in aardich idee west. Wêr hawwe jo sjoen, dat jo my net fine koenen? Hoe ek is it no wat let foar 19 septimber, en ik wit ek net at wy der, foar de iene kear yn 10 jier, jild foar hawwe. Mysha (oerlis) Mysha (oerlis) 16 nov 2022, 16.14 (CET)
- Ik haw in berjocht op jo oerlisside set. As it goed is, krije jo dan fia jo e-mail in melding: "Dy-en-dy hat in berjocht op jo oerlisside set". Sa giet it by my teminsten wol. Dat ik bin der fanút gien dat jo it berjocht krigen hiene, of oars dat jo hielendal net mear aktyf wiene. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 17 nov 2022, 23.45 (CET)
- As parsekontakt hie it in aardich idee west. Wêr hawwe jo sjoen, dat jo my net fine koenen? Hoe ek is it no wat let foar 19 septimber, en ik wit ek net at wy der, foar de iene kear yn 10 jier, jild foar hawwe. Mysha (oerlis) Mysha (oerlis) 16 nov 2022, 16.14 (CET)
- Dank voor de snelle reactie. Mocht iemand zich bedenken hoor ik het graag en kijken we graag wat we kunnen doen. Germien Cox (oerlis) 13 sep 2022, 13.43 (CEST)
Ferstjerren Elizabeth II
[boarne bewurkje]Goeiemoarn, @Drewes @Ieneach fan 'e Esk @Kneppelfreed @RomkeHoekstra Juster is Keninginne Elizabeth II ferstoarn, hjirmei ûntstie in sniebal effekt fan siden dy't oanpaste wurde moatte. Understeande de siden dy't ik fine koe, en sa goed as mooglik by de tiid brocht ha. En der binne nocht wat dingen dy't yn 'e gaten hâlden wurde moatte, dat ha ik tusken heakjes setten (). Is dit alles as binne der mear?
- Elizabeth II fan it Feriene Keninkryk,
- Charles III fan it Feriene Keninkryk, (wat bart der no mei syn titel Prins of Wales?)
- William, hartoch fan Cornwall en Cambridge, (feroarje syn titels no ek?)
- List fan keningen fan Grut-Brittanje,
- Britske prinsen-gemaal en keninginnen-gemalinne
FreyaSport (oerlis) 9 sep 2022, 11.12 (CEST)
- @FreyaSport: Goeie. Neffens de BBC (sjoch hjirre) is William no prins fan Wales. Dat is ek wat en:Prince of Wales seit. Op en: hjit it artikel oer William no en:William, Prince of Wales. Fan itselde lekken in pak foar Catherine. Dêr moatte wy mar yn folgje, tink. Ik haw ek de fermelding op 'e side oer Cornwall oanpast en it steatshaad yn 'e ynfoboks en tekst by it Feriene Keninkryk. Fierder liket it leau 'k net sa gek. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 9 sep 2022, 22.59 (CEST)
- Ha alline, myn twifel as de titels fan de bêrn bygelyks George no ek fan Wales is, om't de Titel Prins fan Wales gjin erftitel is mar in geunst. Ik sjoch dat alle wiki's der by de bêrn ek fan Wales, fan makke ha mar dat soe wol ris in flater wêze kinne. de kommende dagen mar yn 'e rekken hâlde hoe't him dat ûntwikkelet.
- FreyaSport (oerlis) 10 sep 2022, 10.31 (CEST)
- @FreyaSport: Ja, mar se skriuwe "George fan Wales", en net "George, prins fan Wales". Dêr sit him tink ik it ferskil. It is yn it gefal fan George en de oare bern dus gjin titel, mar in ferwizing nei de titel fan 'e âlden. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 11 sep 2022, 23.55 (CEST)
- Moat de List fan keningen fan Grut-Brittanje net de 'list fan steatshaden fan Grut-Brittanje' wêze? De oareheltes Mary van Teck, Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon esfh. en Camilla Parker Bowles wiene/is nammers ek keninginne.--RomkeHoekstra (oerlis) 13 sep 2022, 07.42 (CEST)
- @RomkeHoekstra: nee want de oarehelten falle ûnder de list Britske prinsen-gemaal en keninginnen-gemalinne.--Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 13 sep 2022, 18.08 (CEST)
- Moat de List fan keningen fan Grut-Brittanje net de 'list fan steatshaden fan Grut-Brittanje' wêze? De oareheltes Mary van Teck, Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon esfh. en Camilla Parker Bowles wiene/is nammers ek keninginne.--RomkeHoekstra (oerlis) 13 sep 2022, 07.42 (CEST)
- @FreyaSport: Ja, mar se skriuwe "George fan Wales", en net "George, prins fan Wales". Dêr sit him tink ik it ferskil. It is yn it gefal fan George en de oare bern dus gjin titel, mar in ferwizing nei de titel fan 'e âlden. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 11 sep 2022, 23.55 (CEST)
- @FreyaSport: Goeie. Neffens de BBC (sjoch hjirre) is William no prins fan Wales. Dat is ek wat en:Prince of Wales seit. Op en: hjit it artikel oer William no en:William, Prince of Wales. Fan itselde lekken in pak foar Catherine. Dêr moatte wy mar yn folgje, tink. Ik haw ek de fermelding op 'e side oer Cornwall oanpast en it steatshaad yn 'e ynfoboks en tekst by it Feriene Keninkryk. Fierder liket it leau 'k net sa gek. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 9 sep 2022, 22.59 (CEST)
The Vector 2022 skin as the default in two weeks?
[boarne bewurkje]
Hello. I'm writing on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation Web team. In two weeks, we would like to make the Vector 2022 skin the default on this wiki.
We have been working on it for the past three years. So far, it has been the default on more than 30 wikis, including sister projects, all accounting for more than 1 billion pageviews per month. On average 87% of active logged-in users of those wikis use Vector 2022.
It would become the default for all logged-out users, and also all logged-in users who currently use Vector legacy. Logged-in users can at any time switch to any other skins. No changes are expected for users of these skins.
- Top of an article
-
Vector legacy (current default) -
Vector 2022
- A section of an article
-
Vector legacy (current default) -
Vector 2022
About the skin
[boarne bewurkje][Why is a change necessary] The current default skin meets the needs of the readers and editors as these were 13 years ago. Since then, new users have begun using Wikimedia projects. The old Vector doesn't meet their needs.
[Objective] The objective for the new skin is to make the interface more welcoming and comfortable for readers and useful for advanced users. It draws inspiration from previous requests, the Community Wishlist Surveys, and gadgets and scripts. The work helped our code follow the standards and improve all other skins. We reduced PHP code in Wikimedia deployed skins by 75%. The project has also focused on making it easier to support gadgets and use APIs.
[Changes and test results] The skin introduces a series of changes that improve readability and usability. The new skin does not remove any functionality currently available on the Vector skin.
- The sticky header makes it easier to find tools that editors use often. It decreases scrolling to the top of the page by 16%.
- The new table of contents makes it easier to navigate to different sections. Readers and editors jumped to different sections of the page 50% more than with the old table of contents. It also looks a bit different on talk pages.
- The new search bar is easier to find and makes it easier to find the correct search result from the list. This increased the amount of searches started by 30% on the wikis we tested on.
- The skin does not negatively affect pageviews, edit rates, or account creation. There is evidence of increases in pageviews and account creation across partner communities.
[Try it out] Try out the new skin by going to the appearance tab in your preferences and selecting Vector 2022 from the list of skins.
How can editors change and customize this skin?
[boarne bewurkje]It's possible to configure and personalize our changes. We support volunteers who create new gadgets and user scripts. Check out our repository for a list of currently available customizations, or add your own.
Our plan
[boarne bewurkje]If no large concerns are raised, we plan on deploying in the week of October 3, 2022. If your community would like to request more time to discuss the changes, hit the button and write to us. We can adjust the calendar.
If you'd like ask our team anything, if you have questions, concerns, or additional thoughts, please ping me here or write on the talk page of the project. We will gladly answer! Also, see our FAQ. Thank you! SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 22 sep 2022, 06.15 (CEST)
- @SGrabarczuk (WMF): Hello. I tried this new thing out and I have to say, I see some advantages but a lot more disadvantages. Question: you say we can get more time to discuss the changes, but is there an actual choice here between "Yes, let's do it" en "No, this is not for us so we're going to opt out and keep the old skin on this Wikipedia"? Because if we can't refuse the new skin, then there really is no sense in discussing things, is there? Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 24 sep 2022, 21.42 (CEST)
- Hi @Ieneach fan 'e Esk. That's an excellent question. Thank you for that. The motivation of our team is to make this skin as the default across all the wikis eventually. We want to make that step in collaboration with the communities, just as we've been working with the communities for the past three years when building this skin. Because of that, we do take feedback into consideration, we can have a longer discussion now, although we don't do everything we're being asked for, and perhaps won't do everything you would ask us for. If individual users have specific needs, they may use gadgets and user scripts to adjust the skin. We provide support for those who maintain gadgets and user scripts. Users may also opt-out individually. If they use skins other than Vector, they will not see the change.
- So in short, we can either:
- Have a longer discussion now and don't change the default skin yet or
- Change the default skin and continue working on it (because we will continue working on it anyway); and also
- Point 1 or 2 + you can configure the skin / opt-out.
- What do you think? How does that sound to you? SGrabarczuk (WMF) (oerlis) 29 sep 2022, 19.44 (CEST)
- Hello @SGrabarczuk (WMF): Thank you for taking the time to answer my question. I already knew about the possibility for logged-in users to switch to another skin. That part of the info you posted here earlier was very clear. My question was about fywiki as a whole. I feel you're being a bit vague about it, but the key part of your answer, I think, is: "make this skin the default across all the wikis eventually". So the answer is: no, we (that is, fywiki as a whole) cannot opt out of this new development. We can delay it a bit, but eventually it will become the default here, too, whether the user community likes it or not.
- That being so, I don't see any sense in delaying things. (Although, of course, I can't decide that on my own as I'm not the only administrator here.) In the last couple of days I've been reading some parts of the discussion about the new skin on the MediaWiki link you gave above, and I have to say, I agree with a lot of the criticism on the new skin there. Someone wrote "why are we catering for people too stupid or too lazy to change their window size", and that pretty well sums up my feelings about the new page width. Another thing I disliked very much about the new skin was that I couldn't find the tools at all that belong in the left sidebar. I didn't connect the 3 horizontal lines next to the Wikipedia logo to any sort of menu at all (is that a mobile phone thing? I don't do mobile phones) and had to dig through pages of text about the new features before it became clear to me that is where you had hidden all the tools. Also the fact that the paragraphs in the table of contents are no longer numbered en the fact that de connections to corresponding Wikipedias in other languages are hidden in such an awkward place, while I switch from Frisian to English to Dutch all the time, makes the new skin very unappealing to me. But I know for a fact that you (not you personally, but you at the Wikimedia Foundation Web team) have heard this all before, because I read it right there on the link you gave us. Apparently you (again, plural) didn't do anything with these criticisms, so I don't see how more time to discuss will change these things for the better.
- I have to say, I feel very depressed about this whole thing. It is my opinion that the old skin was close to perfect before the change that gave only a preselection of the corresponding articles in other languages in the left sidebar (a feature which I therefore disabled as soon as I understood how to do that). I have read your rationale for what you are doing and I understand what you're trying to do, but I do not agree with it. I think you (the WFW team) are making a big mistake pushing these radical changes through. I will now change my preferences to keep the old layout, and I think most established long-time contributors will do the same. This will inevitably lead to a disconnect between the layout most contributors are working with en the layout readers (who are not logged in) will see when they visit Wikipedia. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 30 sep 2022, 01.30 (CEST)
- Hi again @Ieneach fan 'e Esk. Thank you for your volunteer time, especially since you took the effort and read our documentation. That's rare! :) I also appreciate that you're being clear about what you know and what you disagree with, or dislike.
- I know that below, there's a lot to read and think of, so take your time. We will not make this skin the default this week. This is both because we're talking here, and because our team decided to make the change on a smaller number of wikis first.
- Since you've mentioned different issues, I'll address these in a numbered list hoping that it could help us break down the discussion into smaller pieces.
- I'm sorry to read that you feel depressed. I believe that a more frequent communication is the only way to fix things! Subscribe to our newsletter and feel invited to any and all our discussions and events.
- Saying that we didn't do anything with the criticism is a very harsh judgement which I disagree with. I think there may be different opposing arguments. In the next days, could you perhaps think of any reasons why our reaction to criticism might have gone unnoticed or underestimated for you?
- "I feel you're being a bit vague about it" - this is because if there's a chance to talk and understand each other better, perhaps change something, we will do that.
- "The old skin was close to perfect before the change that gave only a preselection of the corresponding articles in other languages in the left sidebar" - we disagree about that, and this is perhaps why we disagree about some of the more detailed things. One of many explanations could be that you accepted some things from the beginning, and learned how to accept or configure other things. That's how tech-savvy Wikipedians operate. (That may have been how most viewers operated in 2010, too.) But that's not true for the current variety of viewers.
- "This will inevitably lead to a disconnect" - very true! Unfortunately, this disconnect currently exists. A simple example are tables in articles. Wikipedians think these look nicely with the TOC and infoboxes, but it only takes to have a screen with a smaller resolution to see something different. The same applies to many templates, portals, main pages. The objective for Vector 2022 is to address the most basic issues users have when interacting with the website. At the same time, 87% of users active on our "pilot wikis" use Vector 2022... although it also varies by wiki, and we're not sure yet what the reasons may be.
- Changing the window size - you disagree with our answer? Could you explain why?
- Tools in the left sidebar - first of all, we're moving these tools to the right side of the screen (learn more). These will be pin-able, so exactly the same as the TOC on the left side - will stay despite of scrolling.
- Three horizontal lines - I'm sorry you needed to check the documentation! That must have been irritating. I think it seems to be the best option (even if not everyone recognizes it). If you'd like to talk about the details, write on our talk page and ping Alex - AHollender (WMF) - our designer who makes decisions about these things.
- Numbering of the sections in the ToC - I strongly encourage you to go to our talk page on MediaWiki.org and create a section just about that. Of course, no hurry if you have better things to do. But Alex appreciates when users explain their needs and motivations. He needs that to understand what exactly should be done.
- Links to the language versions - Alex has come up with another idea, and I presented it on Russian Wikipedia some time ago. If you'd like to add anything to that topic, this section will be the best.
- Thank you again. SGrabarczuk (WMF) (oerlis) 4 okt 2022, 02.44 (CEST)
- @SGrabarczuk (WMF): Well, thanks. But I didn't read everything. That would be a fulltime job, I think. My reactions to your points:
- 2. Well, let's agree to disagree then. Sure, there are opposing arguments to be made, but based on what I've read, the development team seems to have had its mind made up about the most fundamental issues before the discussion began. Issues like: do we actually need a new layout for Wikipedia? I haven't come across a 'smoking gun', so to speak, but I'm pretty sure nonetheless that these changes are mostly aimed at mobile phone usage. At the expense of other users. I strongly feel websites shouldn't cater to mobile phone users. It's a nice bonus when things can be arranged for them that don't impact other users, but their interests just shouldn't be the top priority.
- 3. I wrote I felt you were 'being a bit vague' because it really was a yes or no question. I like straight answers, even if they're not the outcome I'm hoping for. That's all I meant with that.
- 4. Well, yes. But that is always so, isn't it? Obviously if I had only come to Wikipedia after the new layout had been rolled out, I would never have missed the old one. I wouldn't call myself 'tech-savvy', though. I know just enough about computers to make problems worse, usually.
- 6. Your answer is: "Most users don't resize their browser windows or use browser plugins to improve the design of the websites they view. Wikis should be good-looking immediately, in their basic form." I don't disagree with this answer, that is actually the problem. You think this narrow text width looks good; I think it doesn't, and the fact that both sidebars are the same color as the background color beneath the text (white), instead of for instance gray, gives the new layout an unfinished look.
- 7. Well, that will be a big improvement at least. It will give the (currently useless) right sidebar a use, and, more importantly, it will take the toolbar away from the table of contents, which it is currently blocking when the toolbar is not collapsed.
- 8. The best option seems to me to leave the toolbar permanently uncollapsed en failing that adding the text "Toolbar menu" at the place where the menu is hidden.
- 9. This concern was already mentioned there, see the top of this section, where a user writes: "The removal of the numbering for paragraphs and their transformation into collapsible lists, will make the articles and discussions unreadable, as their structure will be completely unclear."
- You mention several times that I should involve myself in the discussion about these things on Mediawiki's talkpages. I really don't want to do that, because those discussions go on forever, and, no offence, but frankly I've got better (or at least other) things to do with my time. Anyway, pretty much all the concerns I raised here, have been already mentioned in the Mediawiki discussions by other users, so my contributions would be superfluous. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 11 okt 2022, 12.25 (CEST)
- @SGrabarczuk (WMF): Well, thanks. But I didn't read everything. That would be a fulltime job, I think. My reactions to your points:
@Drewes en Kneppelfreed: Goeie. Ik wit net oft jimme dit wat folge hawwe, mar jimme moatte boppesteande al even lêze, want dizze feroaring kinne wy blykber net tsjinkeare. As jimme witte wolle hoe't de Wikipedy der fan nije wike ôf út komt te sjen, moatte jim mar even nei de Frânske Wikipedy gean, dêr is it al in skoftke sa. Nei myn miening binne dizze feroarings nearne goed foar, en it team dat de nije layout ûntwikkele hat, hat withoefolle krityk krigen, mar se sette har sin troch. We kinne in skoft útstel krije om oer de feroarings te diskusjearjen, mar de útkomst sil úteinlik itselde wêze. Neffens my hawwe wy dan neat om oer te praten, dat lit it dan nije wike mar gebeure, dat stel ik yn myn foarkarren de âlde layout wol yn. As jimme der oars oer tinke en àl útstel hawwe wolle, is no de tiid om dat oan te jaan. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 30 sep 2022, 01.37 (CEST)
- Dei @Ieneach fan 'e Esk, ja ik hie dy hiele sirkus ek al even in bytsje trochsjoen. It wurdt der yndie net better op, suver in stik minder. Ik kaam alris in pear kear op de Frânske Wikipedy en tocht fan wat is dit foar in suterich sjoch gedoch. It liket der yndie op dat we it net keare kinne, dus om it út te stellen, sil nei myn miening ek neat úthelje, dus soe ik sizze lit it mar komme. Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 30 sep 2022, 05.41 (CEST)
- Ik wurd der ek net bliid fan. Bin it mei jim iens, it wurdt der net better op. Benammen de ferwizings yn 'e lofter kolom nei oare wikipedias sil ik bot misse. Drewes (oerlis) 30 sep 2022, 18.53 (CEST)
- Wat my hjir noch it measte oan dwers sit is dat se sizze dat se alles yn gearwurking mei de Wikipedy-mienskip dwaan wolle, mar se dochs trochsette as dy mienskip oanjout de fernijings net hawwe te wollen. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 1 okt 2022, 00.58 (CEST)
- @Drewes: Ik wit net oft jo it sjoen hawwe, mar de ferwizings nei oare Wikipedia's steane yn 'e nije layout rjochts boppe-oan de side yn in útklapber menu, op deselde hichte as de titel fan it artikel. (Dus bgl. op fr:Europe werjûn as "292 langues".) Jo kinne trouwens by Ynstellings, hielendal rjochts boppe-oan njonken jo meldingen, yn it tabblêd Uterlik fêstlizze hokker layout jo persoanlik brûke wolle. Aansten nei de de ynfiering fan 'e nije layout kinne jo dêr dus "Fektor âld en bewend 2010" (de hjoeddeiske layout) oansette en dy sa foar josels yn 'e Fryske Wikipedy weromhelje. Dat moat ek yn ien kear mooglik wêze foar alle Wikipedyen, neffens wat ik hjirre lês (tabel, tredde kolom). (Fektor âld en bewend 2010 hjit yn it Ingelsk blykber "Vector legacy (2010)".) It probleem is, dan krije jo wol in oare layout as dat net ynlogde lêzers fan 'e Wikipedy foarset krije. Mar ja, dat is dan net oars. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 1 okt 2022, 00.58 (CEST)
- Ik wurd der ek net bliid fan. Bin it mei jim iens, it wurdt der net better op. Benammen de ferwizings yn 'e lofter kolom nei oare wikipedias sil ik bot misse. Drewes (oerlis) 30 sep 2022, 18.53 (CEST)
Ynterwiki links
[boarne bewurkje]Wa wit hoe je yn dizze nije úterlik de interwiki links taheakje? Ik doch it no mei in omwei fia wikidata dy't no noch fia de Nederlânske wikipedy te beriken is. FreyaSport (oerlis) 25 okt 2022, 14.45 (CEST)
- Ik wit net, mar ik haw him noch hieltyd op it âlde uterlik. Jo kinne dat by "ynstellings" rjochts boppe oan de skerm ynstelle. Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 26 okt 2022, 02.28 (CEST)
- Ik haw it oan de man frege dy't ús de fernijing brocht hat. Sjoch: Meidogger oerlis:SGrabarczuk (WMF)#Problems arising from implementation new skin. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 29 okt 2022, 00.26 (CEST)
@FreyaSport: No, ik bin sels mar ris op ûndersyk útgien, want dy man antwurdet net mear, wol 'k leauwe. Earst ús de rommel opdringe en dan net thús jaan, dêr mei ik net oer. Wat jo fraach oangiet, as ik dizze fraach en it byhearrende antwurd goed begryp, liket it derop dat de funksje dêr't jo nei fernimme noch net beskikber is yn 'e nije layout. Ik begryp net wêrom't se it spul al útsutelje as it noch net gebrûksklear is. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 00.20 (CET)
- Ik ha justerjûn noch útfûn dat de "Yntertaalkeppelings" lofts ûnder by de helpmiddels stiet. En dan komme de ferskillende talen rjochts boppe te stean. Dat diel fan it probleem is no oplost mar de oare ynterwiki's
- FreyaSport (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 08.49 (CET)
Kategoryen
[boarne bewurkje]@Drewes @Ieneach fan 'e Esk @Kneppelfreed @Kening Aldgilles, Goeiemiddei, der foel my juster en hjoed noch wat nuvers op. Siden komme net altyd mear daalks yn de kategoryen te lâne, dy't al oan de siden tafoege binne. Dit liket my in flater yn it systeem. It foel my juster op by de side oer Martin Hersman en hjoed by de siden oer Grutte Priis Formule 1 fan Saûdy-Araabje 2022 en Grutte Priis Formule 1 fan Bachrein 2022, It kin oant in pear oeren duorje oant in side yn de kategory sichtber wurd. FreyaSport (oerlis) 1 nov 2022, 16.25 (CET)
- Apart, is my noch nea opfallen. Drewes (oerlis) 1 nov 2022, 17.09 (CET)
- @FreyaSport: Ik haw it no krekt even besocht, mar by my stie in side dêr't ik in kategory oan tafoege, dêrnei daliks yn dy kategory. Hawwe jo soms de kategoryside dêr't it om giet yn 't foar al iepen hân yn sokke gefallen? Miskien dat it eardere byld dan yn jo browser "hingjen" bliuwt. Besykje dit ris: set yn it finster boppe-yn jo browser dêr't it webadres stiet, efter dat adres oan: ?action=purge (gjin spaasje tusken it webadres en it fraachteken falle litte). Dan op enter drukke. Dan komme jo op in blanko side dêr't jo frege wurdt "purge the cache of this page?" Op OK klikke. Dêrnei komt de side dy't jo 'purged' hawwe werom en soe jo browser de nijste foarm fan dy side binnenhelje moatte. Ik doch dit wolris as de korrespondearjende siden yn oare talen net ferskine yn 'e lofter sidebar nei't ik in nij artikel oan in Wikidata-item fêstheakke haw. Wurket ek om 'e Haadside fan 'e Wikpedy by de tiid te bringen, mar dêr moat ik ornaris twa kear efterinoar purge foar't it effekt hat. Wit net wêrom. Dus as it foar jo net wurket, besykje it nochris. As it nei twa kear net goed is, moat der wat oars oan 'e hân wêze. Jo kinne dan besykje jo browsercache te leegjen (fan alle websiden dy't jo besykje, slacht jo kompjûter fan alles op, dy rommel ferstoppet de boel). As dat net helpt, wit ik it ek net mear. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 1 nov 2022, 18.14 (CET)
- @Ieneach fan 'e Esk tank foar jo wiidweidige antwurd. Nee ik hie de kategoryen net yn't foar iepen. Mar efkes yn 'e gaten hâlde de kommende dagen of't it faker foarkomt. By myn lêste side oan't no ta barde it net. FreyaSport (oerlis) 1 nov 2022, 19.52 (CET)
- It is my ek noch net oerkommen. Somtiden duorret it even in lyts skoftke ear't se ferskine, mar meastal komme se der wol gau op te stean. Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 1 nov 2022, 20.38 (CET)
Râne ynfoboksen
[boarne bewurkje]@Drewes, Kneppelfreed, RomkeHoekstra, en FreyaSport: Goeie. Ik leau, ik haw it euvel mei de missende rânen om 'e ynfoboksen yn 'e nije layout oplost. Ik wit net oft jimme de nije layout brûke, mar sa ja, soene jim dan de kommende dagen der eefkes om tinke wolle oft alle ynfoboksen wol in tin griis rântsje rûnom hawwe dat har fan 'e rinnende tekst skiedt? As it hjir of dêr noch ûntbrekt, wol ik it graach hearre. By foarbaat tank. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 00.03 (CET)
- Ik sil der op lette, it is gjin gesicht sûnder râne. FreyaSport (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 08.51 (CET)
- Ik sil der ek om tinke. Fral op de mobyl is it gjin gesicht hoe't alles der no út sjocht. It noeget suver út om mar fan de Fryske op de Nederlânske side oer te gean (der't se noch net sa fier binne). --RomkeHoekstra (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 09.42 (CET)
- Dat is dochs wol apart. Ik bin sels net ien dy't browset op 'e mobile tillefoan, mar ik hie begrepen dat dizze hiele operaasje eins opset wie om mobile-tillefoanbrûkers te skewielen. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 11.25 (CET)
- @Ieneach fan 'e Esk Ik kom sakrekt de Berjocht:Ynfoboks plak yn Noarwegen tsjin dy hat noch gjin râne en ek noch net de mooglikheid foar in posysjekaartsje. FreyaSport (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 12.06 (CET)
- @FreyaSport: Ik haw der in oare râne omhinne set. Ik hoopje dat dizze yn 'e nije layout wol sichtber is. Wat de posysjekaart oangiet, is it lykwols itselde ferhaal as mei de ynfoboks Stêd mei flagge: dit is gjin generike/universele ynfoboks, en it is my en Kneppelfreed net slagge om yn sokke oare ynfoboksen in posysjekaart yn te bouwen. It sil perfoarst wol kinne moatte, mar wy beskikke net oer de nedige know-how. Op 't heden is de iennichste oplossing om dizze ynfoboks op in side dan mar te ferfangen troch de Universele ynfoboks stêd. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 12.13 (CET)
- Tige tank foar de râne, spitich dat it net slagget mei de posysjekaart, is it dan noch altyd handich om sa'n ynfoboks as Ynfoboks plak yn Noarwegen oan te hâlden. safolle ferskilt dizze ynfoboks net fan de universele ynfboks stêd. FreyaSport (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 12.20 (CET)
- It is yn prinsipe in prima ynfoboks. Allinne de posysjekaart kinne wy der net yn brûke. Dan is it krekt oft je dêr no de prioriteit oan jouwe of net. Mar ik bin net fan doel om alle âlde ynfoboksen te ferfangen, hear. It taheakjen fan posysjekaarten moat mar ris by de tiid lâns. Ik rin allinne even de stêden nei dêr't ik yn 'e lêste pear jier mei dwaande west haw en dan leau ik it fierder wol. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 12.31 (CET)
- @Ieneach fan 'e Esk Ik ha de ynfoboks omset nei ynfoboks generyk, dat wie yn dit gefal ek noch in opsje om't er oant no ta mar op trije siden brûkt wie. Hoopje dat er no noch folslein wurket.
- FreyaSport (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 14.30 (CET)
- It is yn prinsipe in prima ynfoboks. Allinne de posysjekaart kinne wy der net yn brûke. Dan is it krekt oft je dêr no de prioriteit oan jouwe of net. Mar ik bin net fan doel om alle âlde ynfoboksen te ferfangen, hear. It taheakjen fan posysjekaarten moat mar ris by de tiid lâns. Ik rin allinne even de stêden nei dêr't ik yn 'e lêste pear jier mei dwaande west haw en dan leau ik it fierder wol. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 12.31 (CET)
- Tige tank foar de râne, spitich dat it net slagget mei de posysjekaart, is it dan noch altyd handich om sa'n ynfoboks as Ynfoboks plak yn Noarwegen oan te hâlden. safolle ferskilt dizze ynfoboks net fan de universele ynfboks stêd. FreyaSport (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 12.20 (CET)
- @FreyaSport: Ik haw der in oare râne omhinne set. Ik hoopje dat dizze yn 'e nije layout wol sichtber is. Wat de posysjekaart oangiet, is it lykwols itselde ferhaal as mei de ynfoboks Stêd mei flagge: dit is gjin generike/universele ynfoboks, en it is my en Kneppelfreed net slagge om yn sokke oare ynfoboksen in posysjekaart yn te bouwen. It sil perfoarst wol kinne moatte, mar wy beskikke net oer de nedige know-how. Op 't heden is de iennichste oplossing om dizze ynfoboks op in side dan mar te ferfangen troch de Universele ynfoboks stêd. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 12.13 (CET)
- @Ieneach fan 'e Esk Ik kom sakrekt de Berjocht:Ynfoboks plak yn Noarwegen tsjin dy hat noch gjin râne en ek noch net de mooglikheid foar in posysjekaartsje. FreyaSport (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 12.06 (CET)
- Dat is dochs wol apart. Ik bin sels net ien dy't browset op 'e mobile tillefoan, mar ik hie begrepen dat dizze hiele operaasje eins opset wie om mobile-tillefoanbrûkers te skewielen. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 11.25 (CET)
- Ik sil der ek om tinke. Fral op de mobyl is it gjin gesicht hoe't alles der no út sjocht. It noeget suver út om mar fan de Fryske op de Nederlânske side oer te gean (der't se noch net sa fier binne). --RomkeHoekstra (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 09.42 (CET)
- Ik sil der oan tinke. Hawar ik haw it nije systeem noch net op myn laptop ynsteld dus hie it probleem noch net sjoen. Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 3 nov 2022, 18.14 (CET)
Invitation to attend “Ask Me Anything about Movement Charter” Sessions
[boarne bewurkje]Hello all,
During the 2022 Wikimedia Summit, the Movement Charter Drafting Committee (MCDC) presented the first outline of the Movement Charter, giving a glimpse on the direction of its future work, and the Charter itself. The MCDC then integrated the initial feedback collected during the Summit. Before proceeding with writing the Charter for the whole Movement, the MCDC wants to interact with community members and gather feedback on the drafts of the three sections: Preamble, Values & Principles, and Roles & Responsibilities (intentions statement). The Movement Charter drafts will be available on the Meta page here on November 14, 2022. Community wide consultation period on MC will take place from November 20 to December 18, 2022. Learn more about it here.
With the goal of ensuring that people are well informed to fully participate in the conversations and are empowered to contribute their perspective on the Movement Charter, three “Ask Me Anything about Movement Charter" sessions have been scheduled in different time zones. Everyone in the Wikimedia Movement is invited to attend these conversations. The aim is to learn about Movement Charter - its goal, purpose, why it matters, and how it impacts your community. MCDC members will attend these sessions to answer your questions and hear community feedback.
The “Ask Me Anything” sessions accommodate communities from different time zones. Only the presentation of the session is recorded and shared afterwards, no recording of conversations. Below is the list of planned events:
Asia/Pacific: November 4, 2022 at 09:00 UTC (your local time). Interpretation is available in Chinese and Japanese.- Europe/MENA/Sub Saharan Africa: November 12, 2022 at 15:00 UTC (your local time). Interpretation is available in Arabic, French and Russian.
- North and South America/ Western Europe: November 12, 2022 at 15:00 UTC (your local time). Interpretation is available in Spanish and Portuguese.
On the Meta page you will find more details; Zoom links will be shared 48 hours ahead of the call.
Call for Movement Charter Ambassadors
Individuals or groups from all communities who wish to help include and start conversations in their communities on the Movement Charter are encouraged to become Movement Charter Ambassadors (MC Ambassadors). MC Ambassadors will carry out their own activities and get financial support for enabling conversations in their own languages. Regional facilitators from the Movement Strategy and Governance team are available to support applicants with MC Ambassadors grantmaking. If you are interested please sign up here. Should you have specific questions, please reach out to the MSG team via email: strategy2030@wikimedia.org or on the MS forum.
We thank you for your time and participation.
On behalf of the Movement Charter Drafting Committee,
MNadzikiewicz (WMF) 7 nov 2022, 16.33 (CET)
Apply for Funding through the Movement Strategy Community Engagement Package to Support Your Community
[boarne bewurkje]The Wikimedia Movement Strategy implementation is a collaborative effort for all Wikimedians. Movement Strategy Implementation Grants support projects that take the current state of a Movement Strategy Initiative and push it one step forward. If you are looking for an example or some guide on how to engage your community further on Movement Strategy and the Movement Strategy Implementation Grants specifically, you may find this community engagement package helpful.
The goal of this community engagement package is to support more people to access the funding they might need for the implementation work. By becoming a recipient of this grant, you will be able to support other community members to develop further grant applications that fit with your local contexts to benefit your own communities. With this package, the hope is to break down language barriers and to ensure community members have needed information on Movement Strategy to connect with each other. Movement Strategy is a two-way exchange, we can always learn more from the experiences and knowledge of Wikimedians everywhere. We can train and support our peers by using this package, so more people can make use of this great funding opportunity.
If this information interests you or if you have any further thoughts or questions, please do not hesitate to reach out to us as your regional facilitators to discuss further. We will be more than happy to support you. When you are ready, follow the steps on this page to apply. We look forward to receiving your application.
Best regards,
Movement Strategy and Governance Team
Wikimedia Foundation
MNadzikiewicz (WMF) 14 nov 2022, 17.25 (CET)
Stee fan it mêd
[boarne bewurkje]At ik fan Koartlyn feroare nei de Oerlisside gean, kom ik by it begjin fan de side út. No, no't ik in skoftke net folle Wikipedy dien haw, is it sa dat ik tocht hie dat ik op de ein útkomme soe: op it lêste mêd. Sit ik dêr ferkeard yn, as is dêr eat minder yn wurden?
(Der is by my ek net in "Underwerp" oant der wier eat skreaun is. Gjin streekje, as neat.) Mysha (oerlis) Mysha (oerlis) 17 nov 2022, 09.55 (CET)
- Der is neat oan feroare, hear. It hat neffens my altyd sa west dat je boppe-oan 'e side komme en sels it ûnderwerp opsykje moatte. Om dat makliker te meitsjen kin der wol wer ris wat nei it argyf. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 17 nov 2022, 23.35 (CET)
Opportunities open for the Ombuds commission and the Case Review Committee
[boarne bewurkje]Hi everyone! The Ombuds commission (OC) and the Case Review Committee (CRC) are looking for members. People are encouraged to nominate themselves or encourage others they feel would contribute to these groups to do so. There is more information below about the opportunity and the skills that are needed.
About the Ombuds commission
The Ombuds commission (OC) works on all Wikimedia projects to investigate complaints about violations of the privacy policy, especially in use of CheckUser and Oversight (also known as Suppression) tools. The Commission mediates between the parties of the investigation and, when violations of the policies are identified, advises the Wikimedia Foundation on best handling. They may also assist the General Counsel, the Chief Executive Officer, or the Board of Trustees of the Foundation in these investigations when legally necessary. For more on the OC's duties and roles, see Ombuds commission on Meta-Wiki.
Volunteers serving in this role should be experienced Wikimedians, active on any project, who have previously used the CheckUser/Oversight tools OR who have the technical ability to understand these tools and the willingness to learn them. They must be able to communicate in English, the common language of the commission. They are expected to be able to engage neutrally in investigating these concerns and to know when to recuse when other roles and relationships may cause conflict. Commissioners will serve two-year terms (note that this is different from past years, when the terms have been for one year).
About the Case Review Committee
The Case Review Committee (CRC) reviews appeals of eligible Trust & Safety office actions. The CRC is a critical layer of oversight to ensure that Wikimedia Foundation office actions are fair and unbiased. They also make sure the Wikimedia Foundation doesn’t overstep established practices or boundaries. For more about the role, see Case Review Committee on Meta-Wiki.
We are looking for current or former functionaries and experienced volunteers with an interest in joining this group. Applicants must be fluent in English (additional languages are a strong plus) and willing to abide by the terms of the Committee charter. If the work resonates and you qualify, please apply. Committee members will serve two-year terms (note that this is different from past years, when the terms have been for one year).
Applying to join either of these groups
Members are required to sign the Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information and must be willing to comply with the appropriate Wikimedia Foundation board policies (such as the access to non-public information policy and the Foundation privacy policy). These positions requires a high degree of discretion and trust. Members must also be over 18 years of age.
If you are interested in serving in either capacity listed above, please write in English to the Trust and Safety team at cawikimedia.org (to apply to the OC) or to the Legal Team at legalwikimedia.org (to apply to the CRC) with information about:
- Your primary projects
- Languages you speak/write
- Any experience you have serving on committees, whether movement or non-movement
- Your thoughts on what you could bring to the OC or CRC if appointed
- Any experience you have with the Checkuser or Oversight tools (OC only)
- Any other information you think is relevant
The deadline for applications is 31 December 2022 in any timezone.
Please feel free to pass this invitation along to any users who you think may be qualified and interested. Thank you!
On behalf of the Committee Support team,
Fiktyf elemint yntrodusearre yn 1900
[boarne bewurkje]|Kategory:Fiktyf elemint yntrodusearre yn 1900| -> Oz-ium?
Mei oare wurden: Dit ferhaal hat grif in doel, allinnich kin ik net fine wêr it útskreaun is. Mysha (oerlis) Mysha (oerlis) 1 des 2022, 12.26 (CET)
Parse
[boarne bewurkje]Efkes in berjocht fan de parske-ofsier: Ik haw besocht om kotakt te meitsjen mei dy Martijn van Dijk. Lykwols: Gjin sukses. Is der immen dêr't er in adres by efterlitten hat? Mysha (oerlis) Mysha (oerlis) 1 des 2022, 12.59 (CET)
- @Mysha, hy hat syn emailadres efterlitten, martijn.van.dijk (apenstaartje) mediahuisnoord.nl. Dat is alles dat we fan him hawwe. Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 1 des 2022, 17.52 (CET)
Creative Commons naar het Fries vertaald
[boarne bewurkje]Beste,
Ik ben de taalcoördinator van Creative Commons in het Nederlandse taalgebied, maar ik kan ook Fries lezen en begrijpen. Vandaar dat ik ook dit bericht hier plaats. Creative Commons biedt licenties aan die bijvoorbeeld op Wikipedia en Wikimedia Commons worden gebruikt. Deze zijn nu in concept ook vertaald naar het Fries. Het concept zal een maand lang open staan voor suggesties en taalcorrectie, waarna het opgenomen zal worden als een van de officiële vertaling van Creative Commons 4.0 licenties.
Jullie kunnen feedback geven op de vertaling via https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Talk:Legal_Tools_Translation/4.0/Frisian of ze delen via info@creativecommons.nl
Met vriendelijke groet,
Maarten Zeinstra – Creative Commons Nederland Martsniez (oerlis) 5 des 2022, 13.02 (CET)
- "Public" is tink net "(it) publiek" mar "(yn it) iepenbier". Mysha (oerlis)
- Goede opmerking Mysha, In het Nederlands en het Duits behandelen we 'Public' als publieke licentie, of vertalen we het niet. Maar dit is zeker een opmerking die we moeten documenteren en om input vragen aan de juristen creativecommons.org
- @Martsniez: Ik kin myn kommentaar dêr net kwyt, want it slagget my net om dêr yn te loggen. Ien ding foel my fuort op: Der wurdt hieltyd wer sprutsen fan "Creative Commons publike lisinsjes", wêrby't Creative Commons lykas yn it Ingelsk as in soarte fan eigenskipswurd (bijvoegelijk naamwoord) brûkt wurdt. Dat kin yn it Frysk gewoan net. It moat "publike lisinsjes fan Creative Commons" wêze. En "NetKommersjeel" is in wurd dat yn dy stavering yn it Frysk net bestiet. Dat moat "net-kommersjeel" wêze of foar myn part "non-kommersjeel", mar it kin net oaninoar skreaun wurde. Fierder sil it wol net sa gek lykje (ik haw it allinne even oereage, ik haw gjin tiid om 'e hiele 20 siden te lêzen). Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 6 des 2022, 23.50 (CET)
- Bedankt voor de feedback. We zullen je opmerking bij deze vertaling ook weer in overweging nemen. Bij beide opmerkingen hebben we bij de vertaling naar het Nederlands ook een discussie gehad. In het Nederlands beschouwen we deze woorden als namen met een bepaalde stijl, hierdoor wordt NonCommercial en NoDerivativeWorks ook vertaald naar NietCommercieel-GeenAfgeleideWerken. Terwijl dit ook in het Nederlands op zichzelf ook geen goede woorden zijn. Daarbij wordt de stijl van het origineel behouden, maar inhoudelijk vertaald. We hebben hetzelfde gedaan voor 'Creative Commons Public Licenses'. Martsniez (oerlis) 7 des 2022, 08.41 (CET)
49.929 siden yn it Frysk
[boarne bewurkje]It binne noch gjin 49999 siden, mar sa fier binne wy der net mear fan ôf. No hawwe wy [Wikipedy:Parseberjocht Fjirtichtûzen kear Frysk]. Is der immen dy't wat dwaan wol oan Fiiftichtûzen kear Frysk (of heal ton Frysk, of ...)? Mysha (oerlis) 7 des 2022, 10.17 (CET)
- Spannend, it is inienen safier. bin beneid wanear't de 50.000 berikt wurdt. FreyaSport (oerlis) 7 des 2022, 11.47 (CET)
- Je soene in lyts berjochtsje nei de "trije grutten" (LC, FD en OF) stjoere kinne om te sjen dat dy der wat mei dwaan wolle? Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 7 des 2022, 18.21 (CET)
- No binne it 49.992 siden wurden. Dat, as der eat yn it foar stjoerd wurde moat, dan gau. Taberiedings wienen faaks ek wol in ding. Binne der saken dy't op de lege Fiiftichtûzen kear Frysk komme moatte, dy't wy op Fjirtichtûzen kear Frysk ek dien hawwe? Of oars om, flaters dy't wy it leafst net wer meitsje wolle, of nije ideeën? Mysha (oerlis)
- @Drewes @Ieneach fan 'e Esk @Kneppelfreed @RomkeHoekstra @Wutsje @Kening Aldgilles @Mysha Wit met wat jimme der fan sizze, want ik nim oan dat we hjoed de 50.000 berike, dat ik tink dat it parseberjocht jûn as moarnier ferstjoerd wurde kin. FreyaSport (oerlis) 21 des 2022, 11.42 (CET), Drewes (oerlis) 21 des 2022, 16.39 (CET)
- Bliid ta, wat in grut momint! Hjir dreamde ik jierren lyn al fan. Hulde oan al jim wurk. Ik fyn it prachtich. Groetnis --Kening Aldgilles (oerlis) 21 des 2022, 16.26 (CET)
- Lokwinske allegearre, wylst ik oan it midwinter miel siet, ha we mei-inoar de 50.000 artikels berikt. Ik ha der efkes ien op dronken. FreyaSport (oerlis) 21 des 2022, 19.51 (CET)
- Bliid ta, wat in grut momint! Hjir dreamde ik jierren lyn al fan. Hulde oan al jim wurk. Ik fyn it prachtich. Groetnis --Kening Aldgilles (oerlis) 21 des 2022, 16.26 (CET)
- Geweldich!!!! Lokwinske allegear!!! Ik sil der jûn ek ien op nimme. Tsjoch! --Kening Aldgilles (oerlis) 21 des 2022, 20.12 (CET)
- Yndie in mylpeal! Lokwinske allegear!! Op nei de folgjende 50.000! --Kneppelfreed (oerlis) 21 des 2022, 20.32 (CET), Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 22 des 2022, 00.02 (CET)
Mear as 49.929 siden. Mear as 49.992 siden. Sels mear as 49.999 siden.
Mar alear't it feestdruis útbarst, is der in lêste aksje dy't heart by de ôfrûne 49999+1 siden: Der moat in parseberjocht de doar út. Dan moat dat earst al skreaun wurde!
Ik sil besykje wat ik der oan bydraagje kin, mar it wie better as de tekst yn gearwurking ek wier yn gearwurking skreaun waard. Mysha (oerlis)
- En dêr giet it. As immen wit hoe it Parseberjocht foar no fêstsetten wurdt, dat nimmen fan de adressearden dêr besyket eat te feroarjen: "Fiel jo frij". De netpost draait! Mysha (oerlis)
- En dêr geane hja. De earste "Tankewol, wy sille der grif nei sjen"-s binne al binnen kaam. At der noch in adres is dêr't wy earder net oan tocht hienen, lit my dan noch efkes witte wat der noch by moat. En fierders: der wie útsteld en lit it de WMNL ek witte. Mar ik haw dêr gjin tagong ta. At immen dy al berikje kin, kin dy dat dan dwaan (en fertel it hjir efkens dat wy net mei syn alle gâns de Krystfakânsje dwaande binne). Dat wie it. Foar no: tiid foar in slokje. En foar wa't ik net mear sprek: Noflike Krystdei, en in fredige jierwiksel. Mysha (oerlis)
- Beste Wikipedy collegas, gefeliciteerd met het bereiken van 50.000 artikels! Op naar de volgende 50.000. Met de beste wensen van uw collegas van de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia. Mvg, Taketa (oerlis) 23 des 2022, 23.44 (CET)
Oare wikidy-en
[boarne bewurkje]Foar in oare taal stiet der no "Dizze taal hat syn eigen Wikipedy. Sjoch de Taalske ferzje." No is der ornaris net in grut ûnderskie tusken manlike wurden en froulike. Mar dan moat der fansels net streekrjocht ferwiisd wurde nei it slacht. As ik it sizze moast, dan soe ik sizze dat it "har eigen Wikipedy" wêze soe, mar ik nim oan dat "in eigen Wikipedy" better Frysk is. Mysha (oerlis) 12 des 2022, 10.24 (CET)
- By myn witten is it yn it Frysk mei sokke ferwizings altyd "syn". Yn elts gefal is it sa mei froulike bisten, lykas in ko, ei, sûch, merje, teef, poes, ensfh., dat dêr yn geef Frysk nei ferwiisd wurdt mei "hy" / "syn". Om dêr mei "sy" / "har" nei te ferwizen, is in hollanistyske ynterferinsje. Ik kin my net foarstelle dat soks by abstrakte begripen as "taal" oars wêze soe. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 12 des 2022, 15.26 (CET)
- If leit grif oan my, mar ik wit net of Ieneach no seit dat "syn" goed is, of krekt "harren", of krekt "de". Lit ik it oars besykje: Yn "Dizze taal hat myn eigen Wikipedy?":
- Moat it wêze: "Dizze taal hat syn eigen Wikipedy?"
- Moat it wêze: "Dizze taal hat har eigen Wikipedy?"
- Moat it wêze: "Dizze taal hat in eigen Wikipedy?"
- Moat it wêze: "Dizze taal hat <hjir moat wat oars> eigen Wikipedy."
- Grif haw ik dêr ideeën oer, mar ik wol it antwurd net stjoere. Mysha (oerlis)
- If leit grif oan my, mar ik wit net of Ieneach no seit dat "syn" goed is, of krekt "harren", of krekt "de". Lit ik it oars besykje: Yn "Dizze taal hat myn eigen Wikipedy?":
- O. Nim my net kwea-ôf, dan bin ik net dúdlik west. Wat ik hjirboppe besocht te sizzen, is dat "Dizze taal hat syn eigen Wikipedy" geef Frysk is. Dêr hoecht wat dat oangiet neat oan feroare te wurden. "Dizze taal hat in eigen Wikipedy" is fansels ek goed. As jo dat derfan meitsje wolle, kin ik my net foarstelle dat immen dêr beswier tsjin hawwe soe. "Dizze taal hat har eigen Wikipedy" is neffens my fout en in hollanistyske ynterferinsje, dus dy fariant asjebleaft net brûke. Ieneach fan 'e Esk (oerlis) 22 des 2022, 23.10 (CET)
Community Wishlist Survey 2023 opens in January!
[boarne bewurkje]Please help translate to your language
Hello
The Community Wishlist Survey (CWS) 2023, which lets contributors propose and vote for tools and improvements, starts next month on Monday, 23 January 2023, at 18:00 UTC and will continue annually.
We are inviting you to share your ideas for technical improvements to our tools and platforms. Long experience in editing or technical skills is not required. If you have ever used our software and thought of an idea to improve it, this is the place to come share those ideas!
The dates for the phases of the Survey will be as follows:
- Phase 1: Submit, discuss, and revise proposals – Monday, Jan 23, 2023 to Sunday, Feb 6, 2023
- Phase 2: WMF/Community Tech reviews and organizes proposals – Monday, Jan 30, 2023 to Friday, Feb 10, 2023
- Phase 3: Vote on proposals – Friday, Feb 10, 2023 to Friday, Feb 24, 2023
- Phase 4: Results posted – Tuesday, Feb 28, 2023
If you want to start writing out your ideas ahead of the Survey, you can start thinking about your proposals and draft them in the CWS sandbox.
We are grateful to all who participated last year. See you in January 2023!
Thank you! Community Tech, STei (WMF) 13 des 2022, 13.59 (CET)
Vote for your favourite Wikimedia sound logo
[boarne bewurkje]We are really sorry for posting in English
Voting in the Wikimedia sound logo contest has started. From December 6 to 19, 2022, please play a part and help chose the sound that will identify Wikimedia content on audio devices. Learn more on Diff.
The sound logo team is grateful to everyone who participated in this global contest. We received 3,235 submissions from 2,094 participants in 135 countries. We are incredibly grateful to the team of volunteer screeners and the selection committee who, among others, helped bring us to where we are today. It is now up to Wikimedia to choose the Sound Of All Human Knowledge.
Best wishes, Arupako-WMF (oerlis) 16 des 2022, 10.25 (CET)
Wikipedy:Mienskip/Nije Opset
[boarne bewurkje]It berjocht Berjocht:Wolkom is keppele mei Wikipedy:Mienskip/Nije Opset, jierren âld. Woenen wy d&er noch wat mei, of hat it no gjin doel mear? Aliter (oerlis) 23 des 2022, 18.17 (CET)
- Goeiejûn @Aliter, Sa te sjen is it Berjocht:Wolkom ek hast it iennichste wat echt oan dit artikel keppele sit.
- Miskien wit immen of't er miskien in nijere ferzje fan Wikipedy:Mienskip oanmakke is? FreyaSport (oerlis) 23 des 2022, 18.57 (CET)
Feminism and Folklore 2023
[boarne bewurkje]
Dear Wiki Community,
Christmas Greetings and a Happy New Year 2023,
You are humbly invited to organize the Feminism and Folklore 2023 writing competition from February 1, 2023, to March 31, 2023 on your local Wikipedia. This year, Feminism and Folklore will focus on feminism, women's issues, and gender-focused topics for the project, with a Wiki Loves Folklore gender gap focus and a folk culture theme on Wikipedia.
You can help Wikipedia's coverage of folklore from your area by writing or improving articles about things like folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, women and queer folklore figures, folk game athletes, women in mythology, women warriors in folklore, witches and witch hunting, fairy tales, and more. Users can help create new articles, expand or translate from a list of suggested articles.
Organisers are requested to work on the following action items to sign up their communities for the project:
- Create a page for the contest on the local wiki.
- Set up a fountain tool or dashboard.
- Create the local list and mention the timeline and local and international prizes.
- Request local admins for site notice.
- Link the local page and the fountain/dashboard link on the meta project page.
This year we would be supporting the community's financial aid for Internet and childcare support. This would be provided for the local team including their jury and coordinator team. This support is opt-in and non mandatory. Kindly fill in this Google form and mark a mail to support@wikilovesfolklore.org with the subject line starting as [Stipend] Name or Username/Language. The last date to sign up for internet and childcare aid from our team is 20th of January 2023, We encourage the language coordinators to sign up their community on this link by the 25th of January 2023.
Learn more about the contest and prizes on our project page. Feel free to contact us on our meta talk page or by email us if you need any assistance.
We look forward to your immense coordination.
Thank you and Best wishes,
Feminism and Folklore 2023 International Team
- Stay connected
- Stay connected
--MediaWiki message delivery (oerlis) 24 des 2022, 11.23 (CET)